DSpace Repository

IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE FEWER EXPERIMENTS: PREDICTION OF BACTERIAL SURVIVAL/DEATH PROBABILITY FOR HIGH-PRESSURE PROCESSING WITH THE BAYESIAN APPROACH?

Show simple item record

dc.creator TURGUT, Sebahattin Serhat; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, GIDA MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
dc.date 2021-06-20T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T11:45:35Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T11:45:35Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jesd/issue/62893/929974
dc.identifier 10.21923/jesd.929974
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/93667
dc.description In the present study, a model based on Bayesian Logistic Regression (BLR) was developed to predict the probability of bacterial survival/death treated with high-hydrostatic pressure under different conditions. Previously published data for Listeria monocytogenes in phosphate-buffered saline and Cronobacter sakazakii in trypticase soy broth and infant formula were used where the process variables were pressure, temperature, medium pH, initial inoculum and processing time. Along with the using possibility of BLR, effects of introduced sampling size by changing data split ratio and case prevalence were assessed. The BLR model predictions were consistent with both experimental data and the frequentist logistic regression models. Although some overfitting problems arise as the sampling size decrease, BLR can produce reliable probability models with a smaller number of experimental data (about 50 experimental samples) than the frequentist approach requires. Moreover, instead of a point estimate, BLR offers a posterior distribution for parameters and predictions. So the present study has indicated that BLR can be a useful tool to describe the survival/death of microorganisms after high-pressure processes with less experimental data requirement than the frequentist approach and also with the ability to handle missing observation and imbalanced dataset. In the light of these outcomes, the design of new experiments according to BLR, save on time and costs for experimental studies and more detailed safety risk assessment may be feasible for the food industry.
dc.description Mevcut çalışmada, farklı koşullar altında yüksek hidrostatik basınç işlemine tabi tutulan bakterilerin hayatta kalma/ölüm olasılığını tahmin etmek için Bayesian Logistic Regression'a (BLR) dayalı bir model geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla Listeria monocytogenes (fosfatla tamponlanmış tuzlu su çözeltisi içinde) ve Cronobacter sakazakii (triptik soya broth ve bebek maması formülasyonu) bakterileri için daha önce yayımlanmış verilerden faydalanılmış olup, proses değişkenleri basınç, sıcaklık, ortamın pH değeri, ilk aşılama ve işlem süresidir. BLR kullanım olasılığının yanı sıra, veri bölme oranları değiştirilerek örneklem büyüklüğünün ve verilerdeki vaka sıklığının etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak BLR model tahminlerinin hem deneysel verilerle hem de frekansçı lojistik regresyon modelleriyle tutarlı olduğu gözlenmiştir. Örneklem boyutu küçüldükçe bazı aşırı uyum sorunları ortaya çıksa da, BLR, frekansçı yaklaşımının gerektirdiğinden daha az sayıda deneysel veriye ile (yaklaşık 50 deneysel örnek) güvenilir olasılık modelleri üretebilmektedir. Dahası BLR, nokta tahminleri yerine parametreler ve kestirimler için sonsal dağılımlar sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle mevcut çalışmada, BLR'nin frekansçı yaklaşıma göre daha az deneysel veri gereksinimiyle mikroorganizmaların uygulanan yüksek basınç işlemlerinden sonra hayatta kalma/ölme olasılık kestirimleri için yararlı bir araç olabileceği, eksik gözlemleri ve dengesiz veri setlerini yönetme kabiliyetine sahip olduğu gösterilmiştir. Bu sonuçların ışığında, BLR yaklaşımına uygun yeni deneme tasarımları ile, deneysel çalışmalarda zamandan ve maliyetten tasarruf sağlanması ve gıda endüstrisi için daha ayrıntılı güvenlik riski değerlendirmesi mümkün olabilir.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1740884
dc.source Volume: 9, Issue: 2 628-640 en-US
dc.source 1308-6693
dc.source Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi
dc.subject High hydrostatic pressure,Predictive microbiology,Logistic regression,Listeria monocytogenes,Cronobacter sakazakii
dc.subject Yüksek hidrostatik basınç,Öngörücü mikrobiyoloji,Lojistik regresyon,Listeria monocytogenes,Cronobacter sakazakii
dc.title IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE FEWER EXPERIMENTS: PREDICTION OF BACTERIAL SURVIVAL/DEATH PROBABILITY FOR HIGH-PRESSURE PROCESSING WITH THE BAYESIAN APPROACH? en-US
dc.title DAHA AZ DENEME GERÇEKLEŞTİRMEK MÜMKÜN MÜ: BAYESIAN YAKLAŞIMLA YÜKSEK BASINÇ İŞLEMLERİ İÇİN BAKTERİYEL HAYATTA KALMA/ÖLÜM OLASILIĞININ TAHMİNİ? tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Baratloo, A., Hosseini, M., Negida, A., El Ashal, G., (2015). Part 1: Simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Emergency 3(2), 48-49.
dc.citation Bilbao-Sáinz, C., Younce, F.L., Rasco, B., Clark, S., (2009). Protease stability in bovine milk under combined thermal-high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 10(3), 314-320.
dc.citation Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G., (2000). The odds ratio. BMJ 320(7247), 1468.
dc.citation Butz, P., Fernández Garcı́a, A., Lindauer, R., Dieterich, S., Bognár, A., Tauscher, B., (2003). Influence of ultra high pressure processing on fruit and vegetable products. Journal of Food Engineering 56(2), 233-236.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., (2014). Multi-pulsed high hydrostatic pressure inactivation of microorganisms: A review. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 26, 1-11.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., (2017). Evaluation of different dose-response models for high hydrostatic pressure inactivation of microorganisms. Foods 6(9), 79.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., (2019). High hydrostatic pressure inactivation of microorganisms: A probabilistic model for target log-reductions. International Journal of Food Microbiology 309, 108330.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., Alpas, H., (2004). Modeling the synergistic effect of high pressure and heat on inactivation kinetics of Listeria innocua: a preliminary study. FEMS Microbiology Letters 238(1), 29-36.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., Alpas, H., Bozoglu, F., (2005). Use of Weibull frequency distribution model to describe the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris by high pressure at different temperatures. Food Research International 38(2), 151-157.
dc.citation Buzrul, S., Alpas, H., Largeteau, A., Demazeau, G., (2008). Modeling high pressure inactivation of Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua in whole milk. European Food Research and Technology 227(2), 443-448.
dc.citation Campus, M., (2010). High pressure processing of meat, meat products and seafood. Food Engineering Reviews 2(4), 256-273.
dc.citation Carroll, C., (2019). Pragmatic probabilistic programming: Parameter adaptation in PyMC3.
dc.citation du Prel, J.-B., Hommel, G., Röhrig, B., Blettner, M., (2009). Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 106(19), 335-339.
dc.citation Ferrari, G., Maresca, P., Ciccarone, R., (2010). The application of high hydrostatic pressure for the stabilization of functional foods: Pomegranate juice. Journal of Food Engineering 100(2), 245-253.
dc.citation Gudbjornsdottir, B., Jonsson, A., Hafsteinsson, H., Heinz, V., (2010). Effect of high-pressure processing on Listeria spp. and on the textural and microstructural properties of cold smoked salmon. LWT - Food Science and Technology 43(2), 366-374.
dc.citation Hajmeer, M., Basheer, I., (2002). A probabilistic neural network approach for modeling and classification of bacterial growth/no-growth data. Journal of Microbiological Methods 51(2), 217-226.
dc.citation Hite, B.H., (1899). The effects of pressure in the preservation of milk. West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletins 58, 15-35.
dc.citation Hokmollahi, F., Ehsani, M., (2017). High pressure processing and its application in cheese manufacturing: a review. Journal of Food Biosciences and Technology 7, 57-66.
dc.citation James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., (2013). An Introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer-Verlag New York.
dc.citation Khan, M.A., Ali, S., Abid, M., Ahmad, H., Zhang, L., Tume, R.K., Zhou, G., (2014). Enhanced texture, yield and safety of a ready-to-eat salted duck meat product using a high pressure-heat process. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 21, 50-57.
dc.citation Koehrsen, W., (2018). Bayesian linear regression in python: using machine learning to predict student grades part 2. Medium.
dc.citation Korner-Nievergelt, F., Roth, T., Von Felten, S., Guélat, J., Almasi, B., Korner-Nievergelt, P., (2015). Bayesian data analysis in ecology using linear models with R, BUGS, and Stan. Academic Press.
dc.citation Koseki, S., Matsubara, M., Yamamoto, K., (2009). Prediction of a required log reduction with probability for Enterobacter sakazakii during high-pressure processing, using a survival/death interface model. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(7), 1885.
dc.citation Koseki, S., Yamamoto, K., (2007). Modelling the bacterial survival/death interface induced by high pressure processing. International Journal of Food Microbiology 116(1), 136-143.
dc.citation Lu, S., (2019). Do you know credible interval? Medium.
dc.citation McElreath, R., (2016). Statistical rethinking. A bayesian course with examples in R and stan. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
dc.citation O'Brien, S.M., Dunson, D.B., (2004). Bayesian Multivariate Logistic Regression. Biometrics 60(3), 739-746.
dc.citation Pacifico, A., (2021). Robust open Bayesian analysis: Overfitting, model uncertainty, and endogeneity issues in multiple regression models. Econometric Reviews 40(2), 148-176.
dc.citation PyMC3, (2018). GLM: Linear regression. The PyMC Development Team.
dc.citation Rahman, H.A., Wah, Y.B., Huat, O.S., (2020). Predictive performance of logistic regression for imbalanced data with categorical covariate. pertanika journal of science and technology 28.
dc.citation Ratkowsky, D.A., (2004). Model fitting and uncertainty, in: McKellar, R.C., Lu, X. (Ed.), Modeling microbial responses in food. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
dc.citation Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T.V., Fonnesbeck, C., (2016). Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Computer Science 2, e55.
dc.citation Serment-Moreno, V., Barbosa-Cánovas, G., Torres, J.A., Welti-Chanes, J., (2014). High-pressure processing: kinetic models for microbial and enzyme inactivation. Food Engineering Reviews 6(3), 56-88.
dc.citation Stoica, M., Mihalcea, L., Borda, D., Alexe, P., (2013). Non-thermal novel food processing technologies. An overview. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies 19(2), 212-217.
dc.citation Szumilas, M., (2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 19(3), 227-229.
dc.citation UCLA, (2016). How do i interpret odds ratios in logistic regression? UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group.
dc.citation van Boekel, M.A.J.S., (2020). On the pros and cons of Bayesian kinetic modeling in food science. Trends in Food Science & Technology 99, 181-193.
dc.citation Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Gabry, J., (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing 27(5), 1413-1432.
dc.citation Wang, J., Koseki, S., Chung, M.-J., Oh, D.-H., (2017). A novel approach to predict the growth of Staphylococcus aureus on rice cake. Frontiers in Microbiology 8(1140).
dc.citation Xu, S., (2020a). Frequentist vs. Bayesian approaches in machine learning: A comparison of linear regression and bayesian linear regression. Medium.
dc.citation Xu, S., (2020b). Generative vs. Discriminative probabilistic graphical models. A comparison of naive bayes and logistic regression. Medium.
dc.citation Yamamoto, K., (2017). Food processing by high hydrostatic pressure. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 81(4), 672-679.
dc.citation Zhang, Z.-H., Wang, L.-H., Zeng, X.-A., Han, Z., Brennan, C.S., (2019). Non-thermal technologies and its current and future application in the food industry: a review. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 54(1), 1-13.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account