DSpace Repository

KÜRESEL BULANIK KÜMELER İLE GÜVENİLİRLİK ANALİZİ

Show simple item record

dc.creator ÇAKIR, Esra; GALATASARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator ULUKAN, Ziya; GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY
dc.date 2021-03-30T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T11:45:37Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T11:45:37Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jesd/issue/61057/764492
dc.identifier 10.21923/jesd.764492
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/93680
dc.description Geri dönüşüm süreci, sürdürülebilir bir çevre için atık yönetiminde önemli bir adımdır. Ancak, geri dönüşüm sürecindeki bazı adımlar insan sağlığı için risk oluşturabilir. Depolamada yetersizlik nedeniyle açık alanda uzun süre kalan oksitler çevreyi tehdit edebilir. Makinelerde oluşan insan veya yazılım kaynaklı hatalar nedeniyle zehirli atıklar çevreye yayılabilir. Bu nedenle, geri dönüşüm tesislerinde oluşabilecek birçok problemi öngörebilmek ve doğru çalışma sürecini tasarlayabilmek için sistem güvenilirliği şarttır. Bu çalışmada, geri dönüşüm tesislerinin sistem güvenilirliği için bir yöntem önerilmiştir. Güvenilirliği ölçmek için alanında uzman kişilerce ölçütler ve sistemin bu ölçütlere uygunluğu belirlenir. Bu bilgilere bağlı olarak güvenilirlik göstergesi hesaplanır. Performans önem göstergesi hesaplanarak kritik durumda olan ve güvenilirliği etkileyen en riskli gruplar tespit edilir. Önerilen yöntemde ölçüt değerlendirmelerinde küresel bulanık sayılardan yararlanılmaktadır. Bulanık ifadelerle oluşturulan performans ve güvenilirlik göstergeleri kullanılarak sistemin güvenilirlik seviyesi belirlenmiştir. Böylece, sistem güvenilirliğini etkileyen öncelikli sorunlar tespit edilmiştir. Uygulama için literatürde var olan bir çalışmadan yararlanılmış, analizin geçerliliğini göstermek için elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırılmıştır.
dc.description The recycling process is an important step in waste management for a sustainable environment. However, some steps in the recycling process can pose a risk to human health. Oxides that remain in the open area for a long time due to insufficient storage may threaten the environment. Toxic wastes can spread to the environment due to human or software errors that occurs in the machines. Therefore, system reliability is essential to predict many problems that may arise and to design the correct working process in recycling facilities. In this study, an alternative method is proposed for the system reliability of recycling facilities. In order to measure reliability, the criteria and compliance of the system with these criteria are determined by the experts. Depending on their information, the reliability index is calculated. By calculating the performance importance index, the most risky groups that are in critical condition and affect reliability are identified. Spherical fuzzy numbers are used in the proposed method to evaluate criteria. The reliability level of the system is determined by using performance and reliability indices created with fuzzy expressions. Thus, main problems affecting system reliability are identified. In application, a study in the literature is used and the results are compared to show the validity of the analysis.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1188715
dc.source Volume: 9, Issue: 1 230-239 en-US
dc.source 1308-6693
dc.source Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi
dc.subject Küresel Bulanık Sayılar,Geri Dönüşüm Tesisi Güvenilirlik Değerlendirmesi,Sürdürülebilir Çevre,Bulanık Mantık Güvenilirlik Analizi
dc.subject Spherical Fuzzy Set,Fuzzy Logic Reliability Analysis,Recycling Facility Reliability Evaluation,Sustainable Environment
dc.title KÜRESEL BULANIK KÜMELER İLE GÜVENİLİRLİK ANALİZİ tr-TR
dc.title RELIABILITY ANALYSIS WITH SPHERICAL FUZZY SETS en-US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Akram, M., Alsulami, S., Khan, A., Karaaslan, F., 2020. Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Using Spherical Fuzzy Prioritized Weighted Aggregation Operators, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 13(1), 1429-1446.
dc.citation Ashraf, S. Abdullah, S., Qiyas, M., Khan, A., 2019. The Application of GRA Method Base on Choquet Integral Using Spherical Fuzzy Information in Decision Making Problems, Journal of New Theory 28 , 84-97.
dc.citation Atanassov, K.T., 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96.
dc.citation Atanassov, K.T., 1989. More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 33(1), 37–45.
dc.citation Buckley, J.J., 1985. Ranking Alternatives using Fuzzy Numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15(1), 21-31.
dc.citation Chandna, R., Ram, M., 2014. Fuzzy reliability modeling in the system failure rates merit context, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management , 5(3) ,245–251.
dc.citation Chen S.M., Lee, L.W., 2010. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method,Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2790-2798.
dc.citation Cheng, C.H.,. Mon, D.L., 1993. Fuzzy system reliability analysis by interval of confidence, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 56, No. 1, 29-35, (1993).
dc.citation De-zi, Z., Na, C., 2015. Aeroengine reliability prediction based on fuzzy and interval number, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 99, 1284-1288.
dc.citation Gao, P., Xie, L., 2015. Fuzzy dynamic reliability models of parallel mechanical systems considering strength degradation path dependence and failure dependence”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2015, 1-9.
dc.citation Garibaldi, J.M., Ozen, T., 2007. Uncertain fuzzy reasoning: a case study in modeling expert decision making IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(1), 16–30.
dc.citation Guesgen, H.W., Albrecht, J., 2000. Imprecise reasoning in geographic information systems, Fuzzy Sets Syst 113:121–131.
dc.citation Gündogdu, F.K., Kahraman, C., 2019. Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36, 1–16.
dc.citation Gündogdu, F.K., Kahraman, C., 2019. Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Its Application to Industrial Robot
dc.citation Selection, In: Kahraman C., Cebi S., Cevik Onar S., Oztaysi B., Tolga A., Sari I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 1029. Springer- Cham.
dc.citation Gündogdu, F.K., Kahraman, C., 2019. Spherical Fuzzy Sets and Spherical Fuzzy TOPSIS Method, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 337-352.
dc.citation Jiang, Q. , Chen, C.H., 2003. A numerical algorithm of fuzzy reliability, Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80:299–307.
dc.citation Kahraman, C., 2006. Fuzzy applications in industrial engineering, Springer, Vol. 201.
dc.citation Kai-Yuan, C., Chuan-Yuan W., Ming-Lian, Z. 1991. Fuzzy reliability modeling of gracefully degradable computing systems,
dc.citation Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 33, No. 1, 141-157.
dc.citation Kutlu Gundogdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2019). Extension of WASPAS with Spherical Fuzzy Sets. Informatica, 30(2), 269-292.
dc.citation Mendel, J.M., John, R.I , Liu, F.L. 2006. Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14, (6), 808-821.
dc.citation Noore, A., Cross, P.L, 2005. Modeling the reliability of large distributed non-homogeneous networks, Inform Proc Lett 93:57–61.
dc.citation Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B., Kahraman, C., 2014. Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study,. International Journal of Computational intelligence systems; 5, 1002-1021.
dc.citation Ramli, N, Mohamad, D., 2009. On the Jaccard Index Similarity Measure in Ranking Fuzzy Numbers, MATEMATIKA, Vol.25, Number 2, 157–165.
dc.citation Ross, T.J., 2009. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, John Wiley & Sons.
dc.citation Smarandache, F., 1999. A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth.
dc.citation Şahin, B., Soylu, A., 2020. Intuitionistic fuzzy analytical network process models for maritime supply chain, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 96, 106614.
dc.citation Sahin, B., Senol, Y., 2015. A Novel Process Model for Marine Accident Analysis by using Generic Fuzzy-AHP Algorithm. Journal of Navigation, 68(1), 162-183.
dc.citation Torra, V., 2010. Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539.
dc.citation Tu, J., Cheng, R., Tao, Q., 2015. Reliability analysis method of safety-critical avionics system based on dynamic fault tree under fuzzy uncertainty, Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, Vol. 17, No. 1, 156-163.
dc.citation Tyagi, S.K., 2014. Reliability analysis of a powerloom plant using interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5, No. 13, 2008-2015.
dc.citation Utkin, L., 1994. Knowledge based fuzzy reliability assessment, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 34, No. 5, 863-874.
dc.citation Utkin, L.V., 1994. Fuzzy reliability of repairable systems in the possibility context, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 34, No. 12, 1865-1876.
dc.citation Yager, R.R., 1986. On the theory of bags. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 13(1), 23–37.
dc.citation Yager, R.R., 2013. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceedings of the Joint IFSA World Congress NAFIPS Annual Meeting, pp. 57–61.
dc.citation Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control Vol.8, No.3, 338–353.
dc.citation Zadeh, L.A., 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I, Information Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 3, 199-249.
dc.citation Zeng, S., Munir, M., Mahmood, T., Naeem, M., 2020. Some T-Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Interactive Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Selection of Photovoltaic Cells, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1904362.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account