DSpace Repository

Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Öztosun, Buğra
dc.creator Sakin, Abdullah
dc.creator Çiçin, İrfan
dc.creator Şendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
dc.creator Oktay, Esin
dc.creator Erdoğan, Atike Pınar
dc.creator Karadurmuş, Nuri
dc.creator Er, Özlem
dc.creator Uluç, Başak Oyan
dc.creator Altınbaş, Mustafa
dc.creator İmamoğlu, Gökşen İnanç
dc.creator Celayir, Özde Melisa
dc.creator Aksoy, Sercan
dc.creator Korkmaz, Taner
dc.creator Bayoğlu, İbrahim Vedat
dc.creator Paydaş, Semra
dc.creator Aydıner, Adnan
dc.creator Ebinç, Senar
dc.creator Alkan, Ali
dc.creator Salim, Derya Kıvrak
dc.creator Geredeli, Çağlayan
dc.creator Yavuzşen, Tuğba
dc.creator Karadağ, İbrahim
dc.creator Doğan, Mutlu
dc.creator Hacıbekiroğlu, İlhan
dc.creator Menekşe, Serkan
dc.creator Tanrıverdi, Özgür
dc.creator Gökmen, İvo
dc.creator Artaç, Mehmet
dc.creator Yaren, Arzu
dc.creator Gökmen, Erhan
dc.creator Gümüş, Mahmut
dc.creator Nayır, Erdinç
dc.creator Şakalar, Teoman
dc.creator Dede, İsa
dc.creator Kahraman, Seda
dc.creator Uğraklı, Muzaffer
dc.creator Karacin, Cengiz
dc.creator Oksuzoglu, Berna
dc.creator Demirci, Ayşe
dc.creator KESKİNKILIÇ, MERVE
dc.creator Kanıtez, Metin
dc.creator Baytemür, Naziyet Köse
dc.creator Kuzu, Ömer Faruk
dc.creator Yılmaz, Funda
dc.creator Selçukbiricik, Fatih
dc.creator Yılmaz, Hatice
dc.creator Selvi, Oğuzhan
dc.creator Erdem, Dilek
dc.creator Özdemir, Özlem
dc.creator Avşar, Esin
dc.creator Öktem, İlker Nihat
dc.creator Eren, Tülay
dc.creator Çelebi, Abdüssamet
dc.creator Urul, Enes
dc.creator Mocan, Eda Eylemer
dc.creator Kalkan, Ziya
dc.creator Seyyar, Mustafa
dc.creator Yıldırım, Nilgün
dc.creator Paksoy, Nail
dc.creator Sönmez, Özlem
dc.creator Bayram, Ertuğrul
dc.creator Ergün, Yakup
dc.creator Şahin, Elif
dc.creator Demir, Necla
dc.creator Kalender, Mehmet Emin
dc.creator Gülbağcı, Burcu Belen
dc.creator Okutur, Kerem
dc.creator Işık, Deniz
dc.creator Aslan, Ferit
dc.creator Oyman, Abdilkerim
dc.creator Ünal, Olçun Ümit
dc.creator Almuradova, Elvina
dc.creator Karaboyun, Kubilay
dc.creator Demirel, Burçin Çakan
dc.creator Teker, Fatih
dc.creator Kut, Engin
dc.creator Türker, Sema
dc.creator Kayıkçıoğlu, Erkan
dc.creator Akagündüz, Baran
dc.creator Karakaya, Serdar
dc.creator Acar, Ömer
dc.creator Göksu, Sema Sezgin
dc.creator Ertürk, İsmail
dc.creator Demir, Hacer
dc.creator Çetin, Bülent
dc.date 2023-02-10T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-25T10:32:28Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-25T10:32:28Z
dc.identifier 78fc1821-e830-4912-a671-d972cab74a97
dc.identifier 10.1186/s12885-023-10609-8
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/78fc1821-e830-4912-a671-d972cab74a97/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/100229
dc.description © 2023, The Author(s).Background: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0–14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9–6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8–7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6–6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5–8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5–4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy.
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account