DSpace Repository

Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection

Show simple item record

dc.creator Goker, Barlas
dc.creator ATAY, Tolga
dc.creator AYVAZ, MEHMET
dc.creator ÇAĞLAR, ÖMÜR
dc.creator Özkan, Korhan
dc.creator ORAL, MELİH
dc.creator Öztürkmen, Yusuf
dc.creator Büyükdoğan, Kadir
dc.date 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-25T10:42:26Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-25T10:42:26Z
dc.identifier fe062202-5693-4193-9f48-f97075c4e5d8
dc.identifier 10.1186/s12891-023-07016-2
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/fe062202-5693-4193-9f48-f97075c4e5d8/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/102058
dc.description Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications after non-fusion knee arthrodesis with a modular segmental intramedullary implant used for infected total knee arthroplasty revisions. Methods: A retrospective review of the patients who had been surgically treated with a modular intramedullary arthrodesis implant for recurrent infection after revision TKA between January 2016 and February 2020 were included. The indications for arthrodesis were failed infected TKA with massive bone loss, deficient extensor mechanism and poor soft tissue coverage that precluded joint reconstruction with revision TKA implants. Clinical outcomes were assesed with visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS), Oxford knee score (OKS) and 12-item short form survey (SF-12). Full-length radiographs were used to verify limb length discrepancies (LLD). Results: Fourteen patients (4 male and 10 female) patients with a mean age of 69.3 (range, 59 to 81) years at time of surgery were available for final follow-up at a mean of 28.8 months (range, 24–35 months). All clinical outcome scores improved at the final follow-up (pVAS, 8.5 to 2.6, p =.01; OKS, 12.6 to 33.8, p =.02; SF-12 physical, 22.9 to 32.1, p =.01 and SF-12 mental, 27.7 to 40.2, p =.01). The mean LLD was 1.0 cm (range, + 15 – 2.3 cm). Re-infection was detected in three patients (21.4%). Two patients were managed with suppressive antibiotic treatment and a third patient required repeat 2-stage revision procedure. In one patient, a periprosthetic femur fracture was observed and treated with plate osteosynthesis. Conclusion: Uncontrolled infection after total knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail and satisfactory functional results can be obtained. Level of evidence: Level 4, Retrospective cohort study.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account