| dc.creator |
Celik, Gui |
|
| dc.creator |
MADEN, Murat |
|
| dc.creator |
SAVGAT, Ahmet |
|
| dc.creator |
ORHAN, Hikmet |
|
| dc.date |
2018-12-13T21:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-06T09:24:55Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2020-10-06T09:24:55Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
0ef240ee-5e82-4cda-8310-804016245dee |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.7717/peerj.6109 |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/0ef240ee-5e82-4cda-8310-804016245dee/oai |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/53369 |
|
| dc.description |
Background. Since the introduction of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) instruments to dentistry, a wide variety of Ni-Ti instruments have become commercially available. These Ni-Ti instruments are expensive, which limits their usage in developing countries and forces practitioners to use instruments repeatedly. Another problem is the possible prion cross-contamination associated with the multiple usage of endodontic instruments. In addition, the use of these instruments requires new skills and experience. In this article, the shaping capacities of two conventional rotary file systems, ProFile 25/0.06 and ProTaper F2, were reviewed and compared with the Reciproc single-file system. |
|
| dc.language |
eng |
|
| dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
|
| dc.title |
Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals |
|
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|