DSpace Repository

Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse

Show simple item record

dc.creator Tola, Esra Nur
dc.creator ERDEMOĞLU, Evrim
dc.creator Erdemoglu, Ebru
dc.date 2015-08-31T21:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T09:47:40Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T09:47:40Z
dc.identifier 3a928074-1d82-40fe-85b5-186a1b0d9ca0
dc.identifier 10.4274/tjod.43179
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/3a928074-1d82-40fe-85b5-186a1b0d9ca0/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/57727
dc.description Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the protrusion of pelvic organs to the vagen and is an important health problem in patients of older age. Today, most women with POP prefer uterine sparing surgery due to the changes in lifestyle, beliefs, pregnancy desire, and understanding the role of the uterus and cervix in sexual function. Therefore, the need for newer surgical procedures that involve less invasive surgery, reduced intraoperative and postoperative risks, and a faster healing time in POP surgery have gained importance. Vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic methods are defined in uterine preserving surgery but there is not yet a consensus on which of them should be chosen. In choosing the proper technique, the patient's general status, accompanying disease, correct indication, and the surgeon's experience are all important. In our practice we prefer laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy in patients who prefer to preserve their uterus because of the lower costs and high success rates compared with abdominal and robotic techniques.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account