DSpace Repository

Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study

Show simple item record

dc.creator Erik, C. E.
dc.creator KÖLE, Merve
dc.creator MADEN, Murat
dc.creator KAYA, Bulem
dc.creator Cetin, E. Sesli
dc.date 2018-12-31T21:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T09:48:01Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T09:48:01Z
dc.identifier 3d29141a-69f0-40b9-a01d-69770edde79f
dc.identifier 10.1111/iej.12984
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/3d29141a-69f0-40b9-a01d-69770edde79f/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/57990
dc.description Aim To evaluate the bacterial reduction achieved by WaveOne Gold (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Hyflex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) in canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. The null hypothesis (H-0) was that there would be no difference amongst the NiTi systems in reducing the root canal bacterial load. Methodology Seventy-four mandibular premolar teeth with straight and round root canals were selected. Sixty-two root canals were contaminated with E. faecalis for 4 weeks and subjected to mechanical preparation with one of three single-file NiTi rotary systems (WaveOne Gold, Hyflex EDM, and XP Endo Shaper). Twelve non-contaminated root canals were used as negative controls. Bacterial samples were collected with sterile paper points (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics) before and after rotary instrumentation to quantify the bacterial load. Five roots from each instrumentation group were evaluated topographically from the coronal, middle and apical thirds by SEM. The bacterial reduction was calculated and analysed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, all at 5% significance.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account