DSpace Repository

Thermodynamic analysis of models used in hydrogen production by geothermal energy

Show simple item record

dc.creator Kanoglu, Mehmet
dc.creator BOLATTÜRK, Ali
dc.creator Yilmaz, Ceyhun
dc.date 2010-07-31T21:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T09:48:25Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T09:48:25Z
dc.identifier 4057a6c4-e3fa-45c8-9a5b-6a1024975f44
dc.identifier 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.128
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/4057a6c4-e3fa-45c8-9a5b-6a1024975f44/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/58294
dc.description Four models are developed for the use of geothermal energy for hydrogen production. These include using geothermal work output as the work input for an electrolysis process (Case 1); using part of geothermal heat to produce work for electrolysis process and part of geothermal heat in an electrolysis process to preheat the water (Case 2), using geothermal heat to preheat water in a high-temperature electrolysis process (Case 3), and using part of geothermal work for electrolysis and the remaining part for liquefaction (Case 4). These models are studied thermodynamically, and both reversible and actual (irreversible) operation of the models are considered. The effect of geothermal water temperature on the amount of hydrogen production per unit mass of geothermal water is investigated for all four models, and the results are compared. The results show that as the temperature of geothermal water increases the amount of hydrogen production increases. Also, 1.34 g of hydrogen may be produced by one kg of geothermal water at 200 degrees C in the reversible operation for Case 1. The corresponding values are 1.42, 1.91, and 1.22 in Case 2, Case 3, and Case 4, respectively. Greater amounts of hydrogen may be produced in Case 3 compared to other cases. Case 2 performs better than Case 1 because of the enhanced use of geothermal resource in the process. Case 4 allows both hydrogen production and liquefaction using the same geothermal resource, and provides a good solution for the remote geothermal resources. A comparison of hydrogen production values in the reversible and irreversible conditions reveal that the second-law efficiencies of the models are 28.5%, 29.9%, 37.2%, and 16.1% in Case 1, Case 2, Case 3, and Case 4, respectively. (C) 2010 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Thermodynamic analysis of models used in hydrogen production by geothermal energy
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account