Estimating log volumes of three tree species in Turkey by six formulae

dc.creator	BROOKS, John R.
dc.creator	Ozcelik, RAMAZAN
dc.creator	Wiant, Harry V.
dc.date	2006-10-31T22:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2020-10-06T10:24:11Z
dc.date.available	2020-10-06T10:24:11Z
dc.identifier	5bac17f1-3100-4bca-9f51-87f9e8926e2e
dc.identifier	https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/5bac17f1-3100-4bca-9f51-87f9e8926e2e/oai
dc.identifier.uri	http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/61076
dc.description	Comparison of the Centroid, Center of Gravity, Newton, Bruce, Huber, and Smalian formulae for predicting log volumes of three species in Turkey showed the Newton, Center of Gravity, and Centroid methods were clearly superior to the other formulae. The accuracy of all methods, as indicated by Chi-square accuracy tests, ranged from Newton, Center of Gravity, Centroid, Huber, Bruce to Smalian's formula which performed the poorest.
dc.language	eng
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title	Estimating log volumes of three tree species in Turkey by six formulae
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.