| dc.creator |
ŞENTÜRK, Mehmet Fatih |
|
| dc.creator |
YAZICI, Tayfun |
|
| dc.creator |
BAYKUL, Timuçin |
|
| dc.creator |
FINDIK, Yavuz |
|
| dc.date |
2018-07-31T21:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-06T10:31:46Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2020-10-06T10:31:46Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
6f3ec6a2-a1ca-4ae8-9551-888fb7ccd059 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.029 |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/6f3ec6a2-a1ca-4ae8-9551-888fb7ccd059/oai |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/63031 |
|
| dc.description |
The objective of this study was to compare techniques for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis intraoperatively and to determine the ease of performance of these techniques for the physician. A total of 33 TMJ treatments were done using single-puncture arthrocentesis (SPA) type 1, SPA type 2, and double-puncture arthrocentesis (DPA) (n = 11 in each treatment group) between December 2013 and December 2017. A retrospective analysis of the duration of the procedure (minutes), occurrence of complications, number of cannula relocations, and ease of the procedure was performed. Ease of the procedure was measured using a Likert-type visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10). All measurement variables were recorded intraoperatively, and related data were analyzed statistically. Significant differences were found between SPA type 2 and the other techniques in terms of procedure duration and ease of the procedure (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the occurrence of complications or number of cannula relocations between the techniques (P > 0.05). Compared to the other TMJ arthrocentesis techniques, SPA type 2 is easier, and physicians can perform it in a shorter time. |
|
| dc.language |
eng |
|
| dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
|
| dc.title |
Intraoperative comparison of single- and double-puncture techniques in temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis |
|
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|