| dc.creator |
KARACABEY, Erkan |
|
| dc.date |
2015-12-31T22:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-06T10:48:07Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2020-10-06T10:48:07Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
8cb3aa32-4ef5-43c8-8b7e-5d152430f3a5 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.1590/1678-4324-2016160470 |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/8cb3aa32-4ef5-43c8-8b7e-5d152430f3a5/oai |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/65951 |
|
| dc.description |
Drying data of cape gooseberry was used to compare two fitting methods: namely 2-step and 1-step methods. Literature data was also used to confirm the results. To demonstrate the applicability of these methods, two primary models (Page, Two-term-exponential) were selected. Linear equation was used as secondary model. As well-known from the previous modelling studies on drying, 2-step method required at least two regressions: One is primary model and one is secondary (if you have only one environmental condition such as temperature). On the other hand, one regression was enough for 1-step method. Although previous studies on kinetic modelling of drying of foods were based on 2-step method, this study indicated that 1-step method may also be a good alternative with some advantages such as drawing an informative figure and reducing time of calculations. |
|
| dc.language |
eng |
|
| dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
|
| dc.title |
Evaluation of Two Fitting Methods Applied for Thin-Layer Drying of Cape Gooseberry Fruits |
|
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|