DSpace Repository

Detection of Viruses Infecting Stone Fruits in Western Mediterranean Region of Turkey

Show simple item record

dc.creator Cevik, Bayram
dc.creator Culal-Kilic, Handan
dc.creator Yardimci, Nejla
dc.date 2011-02-28T22:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T11:21:52Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T11:21:52Z
dc.identifier bd02eb23-afa6-4192-8f22-e0312b6d7f71
dc.identifier 10.5423/ppj.2011.27.1.044
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/bd02eb23-afa6-4192-8f22-e0312b6d7f71/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/70764
dc.description Field surveys were conducted in 45 stone fruit orchards in seven districts of Isparta Province located in western Mediterranean region of Turkey important for stone fruit production. Leaf samples were collected from 175 trees showing virus-like symptoms. These samples were first tested by ELISA for five different RNA viruses including Apple mosaic ilarvirus (ApMV), Prunus necrotic ringspot ilarvirus (PNRSV), Prune dwarf ilarvirus (PDV), Plum pox potyvirus (PPV), Apple chlorotic leafspot trithovirus (ACLSV). While no ApMV and PPV infection was found, 46, 24 and 16 samples were tested positive for PDV, ACLSV and PNRSV, respectively, in ELISA showing about 45% of symptomatic trees in the region were infected with at least one of these viruses. In addition, it was found that nine sweet cherry trees were mixed infected with two or three of these viruses and PDV with an infection rate of 26.3% was the most widespread virus in symptomatic trees in western Mediterranean region. Thirty samples were selected and tested by a multiplex RT-PCR (mRT-PCR) for simultaneous detection of these viruses. While PPV was not detected, more than half of the tested 20 samples were individually or mixed infected with ApMV, ACLSV, PNRSV and PDV. The mRT-PCR results were confirmed by detection of these viruses individually in some of the field samples using RT-PCR with primes specific to each virus. Comparison of ELSA and mRT-PCR results of 30 samples showed that numbers of infected and mixed infected samples as well as infection and mixed infection rates were significantly higher in RT-PCR (20 and 66.7%) than in ELISA (14 and 46.7%). The results confirm that mRT-PCR is more sensitive than ELISA.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Detection of Viruses Infecting Stone Fruits in Western Mediterranean Region of Turkey
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account