DSpace Repository

Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotypes in clinical staphylococcal isolates

Show simple item record

dc.creator Gunes, Hayati
dc.creator SESLİ ÇETİN, Emel
dc.creator Demirci, Mustafa
dc.creator Kaya, Selcuk
dc.creator ARIDOĞAN, Buket
dc.date 2008-03-31T21:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T11:50:28Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T11:50:28Z
dc.identifier f096a23b-4a17-4370-a852-f89c69f12d15
dc.identifier 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.11.014
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/f096a23b-4a17-4370-a852-f89c69f12d15/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/75816
dc.description The prevalence of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance as well as the MLSB resistance phenotypes were investigated by the double-disk diffusion test among 532 clinical staphylococci isolates in a Turkish university hospital. The activity of other antimicrobials, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, telithromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin, was also evaluated. Of 532 isolates, 38.5% were resistant to MLSB antibiotics; 63.9% of the resistant isolates exhibited a constitutive phenotype (cMLS(B)) whereas 36.1% expressed an inducible resistance phenotype (iMLS(B)). MLSB resistance was more prevalent among coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains. Oxacillin-resistant strains exhibited significantly higher MLSB resistance rates compared with oxacillin-susceptible strains (P < 0.0001). The most frequently detected resistance phenotype among the total staphylococcal isolates was the constitutive type and this phenotype was more frequently encountered among oxacillin-resistant strains. With the exception of the fully active agents such as vancomycin, linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin, the most effective antibiotics were telithromycin and chloramphenicol among all isolates. Susceptibility rates to other antibiotics tested were higher among isolates without MLSB resistance than isolates with MLSB resistance. The detection of a considerable rate (43.5%) of iMLS(B) resistance among erythromycin-resistant/clindamycin-susceptible strains suggests that the true percentage of clindamycin resistance may be underestimated if testing for inducible resistance is not performed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotypes in clinical staphylococcal isolates
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account