DSpace Repository

İnovasyon Değerinin Yaratılmasında Mimarın Rolünün Walter Gropius'un Çalışmaları Bağlamında Analizi

Show simple item record

dc.creator KOMAN, İlkay; MİMAR SİNAN GÜZEL SANATLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T11:22:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T11:22:46Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mbud/issue/62362/881914
dc.identifier 10.30785/mbud.881914
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/91475
dc.description Tarihte insan yaşamını etkileyen yeni süreçler ve teknolojiler sadece yeni olmakla değil, var olan fikirlerin farklı bir şekilde hayata geçirilmesiyle ortaya çıkmıştır. Mühendislik tarihte çoğunlukla inşaat bilgisini yönlendiren ve yenilikleri geliştiren yegâne meslek olarak görülmüştür. Modern Hareket’in öncüleri olan mimarlar bu imajı değiştirmeye çalıştıklarında, hayatın her alanında sanayi ve makineleşmenin kabul görmesine karşılık mimarı geleneksel sanatsal statüsünden uzaklaştırmakla suçlanmıştır. Bu makale, mimarların endüstriyel inşaat yöntemlerinin geliştirilmesindeki rolünün yanı sıra, prefabrikasyon alanındaki inovatif katkılarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu incelemede tarama ve çapraz başvurulara dayanan tartışma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Mimari tasarım düşüncesinin inşaat inovasyonunun ortaya çıkmasındaki etkisi, inovasyon teorileri ile mimari tasarım ve üretim düşüncesi bağlamındaki literatürün tartışılmasında Modernizmin önemli temsilcilerinden Walter Gropius’un çalışmaları örnek alınmıştır. Sonuçta mimarın rol oynadığı inovasyon süreçleri üç temel başlıkta yorumlanmıştır.
dc.description Engineering has been widely accepted as the only profession that directs and develops construction knowledge. When the leading architects of the Modern Movement in Architecture tried to change this image, they were accused of distancing the architect from the traditional artistic status despite the acceptance of industry and mechanization in all areas of life. In the history of construction, important innovations, which are often associated with prefabrication, have been realized as a result of architects' design approaches that interpret function and construction together. The aim of this article is to examine the effect of architectural design thinking on the emergence of construction innovation. The literature in the context of innovation theories and architectural design and production thought was discussed through Walter Gropius, one of the important representatives of Modernism. As a result, the impact of the architect on construction innovations was evaluated and the innovation processes they contributed to were identified.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1583457
dc.source Volume: 6, Issue: 1 97-114 en-US
dc.source 2548-0170
dc.source 2548-0170
dc.source Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications
dc.subject İnovasyon,yapım tarihi,prefabrikasyon
dc.subject Innovation,construction history,prefabrication
dc.title İnovasyon Değerinin Yaratılmasında Mimarın Rolünün Walter Gropius'un Çalışmaları Bağlamında Analizi tr-TR
dc.title Analysis of the Architect's Role in Creating Innovation Value in the Context of Walter Gropius's Works en-US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254-285.
dc.citation Alvis, J. A. M. (2017). Through a Technique of Building, Icon, 23, 83-112.
dc.citation Anlage Katalog Kupferhäuser, katalog no:12. Erişim adresi (10.01.2021): https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/bitstream/11303/3743/3/Dokument_16.pdf.
dc.citation Arieff, A. ve Burkhart, B. (2002). Prefab, 1st edition, Layton: Gibbs Smith, 24-25.
dc.citation Bayer, H., Gropius, W., ve Gropius, I. (Ed.). (1938). Bauhaus, 1919-1928, CT Branford Company, 17, 110-111.
dc.citation Bonenberg, W. ve Kapliński, O. (2017). Knowledge is the key to innovation in architectural design, Procedia Engineering, 208, 2-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.013.
dc.citation Bowley, M. (1966). The British building industry: Four studies in response and resistance to change, 1st edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169-170.
dc.citation Brookes, A. J. ve Poole, D. (2012). Innovation in Architecture: A Path to the Future, 1st edition, New York & London: Taylor & Francis, 1-16.
dc.citation Burkhart, B. ve Arieff, A. (2002). Prefab, 1st edition, Layton: Gibbs Smith, 24-25.
dc.citation Carsten Janssen / cc-by-sa-2.0-de (2021). File:Fagus Gropius Hauptgebaeude 200705 wiki front.jpg. (2021, January 31). Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Erişim adresi (03.05.2021): https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fagus_Gropius_Hauptgebaeude_200705_wiki_front.jpg&oldid=529526621.
dc.citation Carvalho, O. (2007). The Revolutionary Mentality, Çev. Tiago Tondineli, A mentalidade revolucionária, Diário do Comércio. Erişim adresi (13.12.2020): http://againstred.blogspot.com/2007/09/revolutionary-mentality-by-olavo-de.html.
dc.citation Davis, Gajendran, T. Vaughan, J. ve Owi, T. (2016). Assessing construction innovation: theoretical and practical perspectives, Construction Economics and Building, 16(3), 104-115. doi:10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5178.
dc.citation Deamer, (2000). Detail: The Subject of the Object, Praxis, 1(1), 108-115.
dc.citation Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120-1171.
dc.citation Freeman, C. ve Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edition, Oxon: Routledge, 197.
dc.citation Frier, M. Fisker, A. M. ve Kirkegaard, H. (2010). Prefab-Interiority: Design Principles for a Sensuous Prefab Practice, Design Principles and Practice: An International Journal, 4(2),415-426. Erişim adresi (15.01.2021): http://ijg.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.154/prod.390.
dc.citation Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: the History of a Category. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper, Montreal: INRS, 1-67. Erişim adresi (12.11.2020): http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/IntellectualNo1.pdf.
dc.citation Gropius, W. (1927). Wege zur fabrikatorischen Hausherstellung, In Bau und Wohnung, Deutscher Werkbund, Stuttgart: Akad. Verlag Dr. Fr. Wedekind & Co., 61.
dc.citation Gropius, W. (1930). Bauhausbauten Dessau, Walter Gropius & László Moholy-Nagy (Ed.). Bauhausbücher 12, Munich: A. Langen. 161.
dc.citation Herbert, G. (1984). The Dream of the Factory-Made House: Walter Gropius and Konrad Wachsmann, 1st edition, Cambridge: Mit Press.
dc.citation Hoffa, H. (1961). Walter Gropius Innovator, Art Education, 14(1), 22-28.
dc.citation Imperiale, A. (2012). An American Wartime Dream: The Packaged House System of Konrad Wachsmann and Walter Gropius, 2012 ACSA Fall Conference: OFFSITE, Philadelphia: Temple University, Modular Building Institute, 39-43. Erişim adresi (05.11.2020): https://www.acsa-arch.org/proceedings/ Fall%20Conference%20Proceedings/ACSA.FALL.12/ACSA.FALL.12.8.pdf.
dc.citation Jones, D. E. (2017). Walter Gropius and the (Not So) Infinite Possibilities of Prefabrication. Erişim adresi (24.11.2020): https://aiacalifornia.org/walter-gropius-and-prefab/.
dc.citation Jönsson, R. (2013). Fred Forbat and the History of Functionalism, Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 16(4), 79-85. Erişim adresi (05.01.2021): http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/download/300/260.
dc.citation Kamien, M. I. ve Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2.
dc.citation Kavak, Ç. (2009). Bilgi Ekonomisinde Inovasyon Kavramı ve Temel Göstergeleri, Akademik Bilişim’09- XI. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 11-13 Şubat, Şanlıurfa: Harran Üniversitesi, 617-628. Erişim adresi (16.01.2021): https://ab.org.tr/ab09/kitap/kavak_inovasyon_AB09.pdf.
dc.citation Kinnunen, J. (1996). Gabriel Tarde as a Founding Father of Innovation Diffusion Research, Acta Sociologica, 39(4), 431-442. Erişim adresi (05.01.2021): https://www.jstor.org/stable/4194846.
dc.citation Kleinsmann, M. Valkenburg, R. ve Sluijs, J. (2017). Capturing the Value of Design Thinking in Different Innovation Practices, International Journal of Design, 11(2), 25-40.
dc.citation Koeper, H. F. (2020). Walter Gropius, Encyclopedia Britannica, Erişim adresi (03.01.2021): https://www.britannica.com/biography/Walter-Gropius.
dc.citation Kunkel, U. (2006). Kupferhäuser der Hirsch Kupfer- und Messingwerke aus Eberswalde-Finow, 1930 – 33 … in die Jahre gekommen, db deutsche bauzeitung, Erişim adresi (03.01.2021): https://www.db-bauzeitung.de/db-themen/schwerpunkt/in-die-jahre-gekommen-25/.
dc.citation Lennartz, M. W. ve Jacob-Freitag, (2015). New Architecture in Wood: Forms and Structures, Birkhäuser, 8.
dc.citation Loureiro, F. (2014). The Revolutionary Mind of Walter Gropius: Architectural Utopias for the Machine Age, Utopian Studies, 25(1), 174-193. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.25.1.0174.
dc.citation Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National Innovation Systems: Analytical Concept and Development Tool, Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863.
dc.citation Manley, K. (2008). Against The Odds: Small Firms in Australia Successfully Introducing New Technology on Construction Projects, Research Policy, 37(10), 1751-1764. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.013.
dc.citation Manseau, A. (2005). Building Tomorrow: Innovation in Construction and Engineering, Kindle Edition, Taylor & Francis, 409-411.
dc.citation Meyrick, J. (2016). Exactly what is innovative about the word ‘innovation’?, Erişim adresi (08.12.2020): https://theconversation.com/exactly-what-is-innovative-about-the-word-innovation-58720.
dc.citation Miozzo, M. ve Dewick, (2004). Innovation in Construction: A European Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing, 13-15.
dc.citation Moe, K. ve Smith, R. (2012). Introduction: systems, technics, and society, Building Systems: Design Technology and Society, Kiel Moe & Ryan E. Smith (Ed.), New York: Routledge, 1-9.
dc.citation Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization, San Diego: Hartcourt Brace and Co., 13-20.
dc.citation Nerdinger, W. (1988). Walter Gropius: opera completa, Segrate: Edizioni Electa, 70.
dc.citation Nierendorf, K., (1923). Staatliches Bauhaus Weimar 1919–1923, Weimar and Munich: Bauhausverlag. 169-170.
dc.citation OECD, (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3. Basım (Dijital kopya), Paris: OECD Publishing, Erişim adresi (05.11.2020): https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264013100en.pdf?expires=1610794466&id=id&accname=guest&checksum= 0150B3015F3A0406CF41FC99219734C8.
dc.citation Ogburn, W. F. (1941). National Policy and Technology, Technology And Society: The Influences of Machines in The United States, Rosen M. & Rosen L. (Ed.), New York: Macmillan Co., 3-29.
dc.citation Piroozfar, P. ve Farr, E. R. (2013). Evolution of Nontraditional Methods of Construction: 21st Century Pragmatic Viewpoint, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 19(2), 119-133. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000078.
dc.citation Prochiner, F. (2006). Homes 24 (Doktorarbeit). Münih: Technische Universität München, Fakultät für Architektur, 25.
dc.citation Rodríguez, L. F. ve Monrabal, C. (2011). El General Panel System de Konrad Wachsmann y Walter Gropius, 1941, Actas del Séptimo Congreso Nacional de Historia de la Construcción, Santiago, 375-385, Erişim adresi (12.12.2020): https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4133200.
dc.citation Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd Edition, New York: Free Press.
dc.citation Röder, S., ve Elliott, F. (1998). " Moderne Baukunst" 1900-14: The Architectural Collection of the Deutscher Werkbund. The Journal of the Decorative Arts Society 1850-the Present, (22), 4-17. Erişim adresi (26.12.2020): http://www.jstor.org/stable/41809268.
dc.citation Rupnik, I. (2012). Industrialized Housing Delivery and The Role of the Architect, Kiel Moe & Ryan E. Smith (Ed.), Building Systems: Design Technology and Society (86-103). New York: Routledge.
dc.citation Sabatto, S. (2015). L'espace dans l'iconoclaste distribution des contraintes et des souhaits : Modèles, photos et dessins dans la conception des systèmes constructifs de la Guerre Froide. Carte Semiotiche / Images qui font signe. Modes et pratiques de représentation diagrammatique dans les images informationnelles, 142. Erişim adresi (19.01.2021): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321211317_L'espace_dans_l'iconoclaste_distribution_des_contraintes_et_des_souhaits_Modeles_ photos_et_dessins_dans_la_conception_des_systemes_constructifs_de_la_Guerre_Froide.
dc.citation Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 84-85.
dc.citation Scruton, R. (2013). The Aesthetics of Architecture, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 85-87.
dc.citation Seelow, A. M. (2018). The Construction Kit and the Assembly Line—Walter Gropius’ Concepts for Rationalizing Architecture, In Arts, 7(4), 95. doi:10.3390/arts7040095.
dc.citation Slaughter, E. (1993). Builders as Sources of Construction Innovation, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 532-549. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:3(532).
dc.citation Smith, R. E. ve Quale, J. D. (Ed.) (2017). Offsite architecture: constructing the future, 1st Edition, Londra: Routledge.
dc.citation Tatum, C. B. (1989). Organizing to Increase Innovation in Construction Firms, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115 (4), 602-617. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:4(602).
dc.citation Tomlow, J. (2003). Industrialized log building by the Christoph & Unmack in Saxony (1907-1940), Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, 20-24 January, Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera, 1989-1999, Erişim adresi (05.11.2020): http://www.sedhc.es/biblioteca/actas/CIHC1_186_ Tomlow%20J.pdf.
dc.citation Tökmeci, E. Ö. (2013). Mimarlıkta Rasyonellik, 1. Basım, İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Yayınları, 85-86.
dc.citation Uzun, T. (2019). Bauhaus Ekolü ve Kuramsal Arka Planı, Latif Gürkan Kaya (Ed.), Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Alanında Yeni Ufuklar (411-488). Ankara: Gece Akademi. Erişim adresi (5.11.2020): https://www.gecekitapligi.com/Webkontrol/uploads/Fck/mimarlik_9.pdf.
dc.citation Wachsmann, K. L., ve Gropius, W. (1944). U.S. Patent No. 2,355,192. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Erişim adresi (19.01.2021): https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/20/0c/74/ 26583f61abd58b/US2355192-drawings-page-3.png.
dc.citation Winch, G. (1998). Zephyrs of Creative Destruction: Understanding the Management of Innovation in Construction, Building Research and Information, 26(5), 268-279. doi: 10.1080/096132198369751.
dc.citation Wylant, B. (2008). Design Thinking and the Experience of Innovation, Design Issues, 24(2), 3-14. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.2.3.
dc.citation Xue, X. Zhang, R. Yang, R. ve Dai, J. (2014). Innovation in Construction: A Critical Review and Future Research, International Journal of Innovation Science, 6(2), 111-126. doi:doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.6.2.111.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account