DSpace Repository

The Effect of CEO Characteristics on Stock Returns within Upper Echelons Theory

Show simple item record

dc.creator UNAL, Serkan; UFUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator DOĞRU, Çağlar; UFUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2021-02-20T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T11:27:30Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T11:27:30Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vizyoner/issue/60146/725725
dc.identifier 10.21076/vizyoner.725725
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/91684
dc.description The effects of top management teams’ characteristics on company performance has become very popular with the upper echelon’s theory, created in 1984. This has led to various academic studies on that topic however there is no detailed study conducted in Turkey. In the study, the effects of CEO characteristics on company performance is analyzed by using data of large-scale Turkish firms which are members of the BIST100 index over 2015 and 2019. According to the results obtained from the research, the age of the CEO, the CEO duality, and the CEO’s experience in the current company have no statistically significant effect on the stock performance. CEO’s experience in the current position and past experience working as a CEO have positive impact on the performance of the company. As the important findings in the research, (1) 84% of the companies in BIST100 are appointed insiders to the CEO position, (2) the insider CEOs stay three times more than the outsiders, and (3) there is a positive relation between CEO’s experience working as a CEO and company performance.
dc.description 1984 yılında oluşturulan üst kademe (upper echelons) kuramı şirketlerin üst yönetim ekiplerinin özelliklerinin şirket performansına etkisini gündeme taşımıştır. Bu konuda birçok araştırma yapılmış olsa da Türkiye’de yapılmış detaylı bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki büyük ölçekli firmaların önemli bir kısmını içeren BİST100 endeksindeki şirketlere ait 2015-2019 yıllarını kapsayan veri seti kullanılarak şirket CEO’larının özelliklerinin şirket performansına etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara CEO yaşı, CEO ikiliği, CEO’nun aynı firmada çalıştığı süre ve CEO’nun aynı firma içinden atanmasının şirket performansına etkisi bulunmamaktadır. CEO’nun mevcut pozisyonda geçirdiği sürenin ve toplam CEO olarak çalışma tecrübesinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde şirket performansına olumlu yansıdığı görülmüştür. Araştırmada önemli bulgular olarak (1) BİST100’deki şirketlerin %84’ünün CEO pozisyonuna içerden atama yaptıkları, (2) içerden atanan CEO’ların aynı pozisyonda dışarıdan atanan CEO’lara kıyasla üç kat daha fazla kaldığı ve (3) CEO olarak çalışılan süre ile elde edilen performans arasında pozitif ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1067507
dc.source Volume: 12, Issue: 29 204-223 en-US
dc.source 1308-9552
dc.source Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi
dc.subject Stock Price Performance,BIST100,CEO Age,CEO Tenure,CEO Duality
dc.subject Hisse Fiyat Performansı,BIST100,CEO Yaşı,CEO Kıdemi,CEO İkiliği
dc.title The Effect of CEO Characteristics on Stock Returns within Upper Echelons Theory en-US
dc.title Üst Kademe Kuramı Kapsamında Hisse Getirileri Üzerinde CEO’nun Özelliklerinin Etkisi tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Acemoglu, D. ve Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30.
dc.citation Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R. ve Tsoulouhas, T. (2006). Are outsiders handicapped in CEO successions?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 619-644.
dc.citation Andreou, P. C., Louca, C. ve Petrou, A. P. (2017). CEO age and stock price crash risk. Review of Finance, 21(3), 1287-1325.
dc.citation Avcı, E. (2018). Ortaklık yapısı ve şirket performansı: Borsa İstanbul'da bir uygulama. Journal of Research in Business, 3(1), 31-52.
dc.citation Aygün, M. ve İç, S. (2010). Genel müdürün aynı zamanda yönetim kurulu üyesi olması firma performansını etkiler mi?. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (47), 192-201.
dc.citation Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
dc.citation Bantel, K. A. ve Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107 – 124.
dc.citation Barak, O. (2007). Hisse senedi piyasasında halka açıklık oranının piyasa fiyatı üzerine etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 10(1-2), 59-72.
dc.citation Barker III, V. L. ve Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782-801.
dc.citation Bertrand, M. ve Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169-1208.
dc.citation Besler, S. (2006). Characteristics of Top Management Teams in Turkey. South East European Journal of Economics & Business (1840118X), (2),43-53.
dc.citation Borokhovich, K. A., Parrino, R. ve Trapani, T. (1996). Outside directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 337-355.
dc.citation Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301-312.
dc.citation Brockmann, E. N. ve Simmonds, P. G. (1997). Strategic decision making: The influence of CEO experience and use of tacit knowledge. Journal of Managerial Issues, 454-467.
dc.citation Buchanan, J., Chai , D. ve Deakin, S. (2018). Unexpected corporate outcomes from hedge fund activism in Japan. Socio-Economic Review, 00(0), 1-22. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy007
dc.citation Burke, D. M. ve Light, L. L. (1981). Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin, 90(3), 513.
dc.citation Celikyurt, U. ve Donmez, B. (2017). Engineer CEOs and firm performance in BIST manufacturing Firms. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi,75, 207-228.
dc.citation Cernat, L. (2004). The emerging European corporate governance model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or still the century of diversity?. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 147-166.
dc.citation Clapham, S. E., Schwenk, C. R. ve Caldwell, C. (2005). CEO perceptions and corporate turnaround. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 407-428.
dc.citation Clark, T. S. ve Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects?. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399-408.
dc.citation Cline, B. N. ve Yore, A. S. (2016). Silverback CEOs: Age, experience, and firm value. Journal of Empirical Finance, 35, 169-188.
dc.citation Çarkcı, A. ve Ataman, G. (2016). Impact of the board structure on financial performance by stewardship theory perspective, Social Sciences, 1, 151-164.
dc.citation Doğan, M. ve Topal, Y. (2015). Yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü ile finansal performans arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik literatür taraması. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1).
dc.citation Donaldson, L. ve Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal Of Management, 16(1), 49-64.
dc.citation Du, Q., Gao, H. ve Levi, M. D. (2012). The relative-age effect and career success: Evidence from corporate CEOs. Economics Letters, 117(3), 660-662.
dc.citation Dursun, İ. T. ve Köseoğlu, Y. (2016). Üst kademe teorisi’ni yeniden düşünmek: Üst yönetim ekiplerinin bilişsel özellikleri & teorik açıdan kapsamı ve önemi. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 117-133.
dc.citation Eduardo, M. ve Poole, B. (2016). CEO age and gender: Subsequent market performance. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1146389.
dc.citation Ersoy, E., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. ve Şamiloğlu, F. (2011). Türkiye’de kurumsal yönetim ve firma performansı (tobin-q ve anormal getiri) arasındaki ilişkinin analizi (The Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance (Tobin-q and Abnormal Return) in Turkey). Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 48(554).
dc.citation Finkelstein, S. ve Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503.
dc.citation Fitza, M. A. (2017). How much do CEOs really matter? Reaffirming that the CEO effect is mostly due to chance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 802-811.
dc.citation Forbes, D. P. (2005). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 355-366.
dc.citation Geddes, R. R. ve Vinod, H. D. (1997). CEO age and outside directors: A hazard analysis. Review of Industrial Organization, 12(5-6), 767-780.
dc.citation Gujarati, (2004). Basic Econometrics, 4th Ed., McGraw Hill.
dc.citation Hambrick, D. C. ve Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
dc.citation Henderson, A. D., Miller, D. ve Hambrick, D. C. (2006). How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 447-460.
dc.citation Hill, C. W. ve Phan, P. (1991). CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 707-717.
dc.citation Hsu, S., Lin, S. W., Chen, W. P. ve Huang, J. W. (2019). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 101011.
dc.citation Iqbal, Z. (2015). CEO age, education, and introduction of hedging in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(1), 189-200.
dc.citation Isyatirim. (2020a). İşyatırım takip listesi. Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2020. Erişim adresi: https://www.isyatirim.com.tr/tr-tr/analiz/hisse/Sayfalar/takip-listesi.aspx#page-1, (27.02.2020).
dc.citation Isyatirim. (2020b). İşyatırım takip listesi. Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2020. Erişim adresi: https://www.isyatirim.com.tr/tr-tr/analiz/hisse/Sayfalar/Temel-Degerler-Ve-Oranlar.aspx#page-1 (01.01.2020).
dc.citation John Harry III, E., Gao, Z., Hwang, Y. ve Wu, W. T. (2018). Performance periods in CEO performance-based equity awards: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 161-190.
dc.citation Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M. ve Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter?. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 973-1007.
dc.citation Kılıç, M. ve Ayrıçay, Y. (2018). Yönetim kurulu ve sahiplik yapısının finansal performans üzerindeki etkisi: BIST imalat sanayi sektöründe bir alan araştırması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 177-192.
dc.citation Kitchell, S. (1997). CEO characteristics and technological innovativeness: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 14(2), 111-121.
dc.citation Loderer, C. F. ve Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance. Available at SSRN 1342248.
dc.citation Loureiro, G., Makhija, A. K. ve Zhang, D. (2020). One dollar CEOs. Journal of Business Research, 109, 425-439.
dc.citation McKnight, P. J., Tomkins, C., Weir, C. ve Hobson, D. (2000). CEO age and top executive pay: A UK empirical study. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(3), 173-187.
dc.citation Milbourn, T. T. (2003). CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 233-262.
dc.citation Nguyen, P., Rahman, N. ve Zhao, R. (2018). CEO characteristics and firm valuation: a quantile regression analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 22(1), 133-151.
dc.citation Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V. ve Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: one mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of applied Psychology, 88(5), 795.
dc.citation Quigley, T. J. ve Hambrick, D. C. (2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America's attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821-830.
dc.citation Rajagopalan, N. ve Datta, D. K. (1996). CEO characteristics: does industry matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 197-215.
dc.citation Rodenbach, M. ve Brettel, M. (2012). CEO experience as micro‐level origin of dynamic capabilities. Management Decision. 50(4), 611-634
dc.citation Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251-273.
dc.citation Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653-662.
dc.citation Sitthipongpanich, T. ve Polsiri, P. (2015). Do CEO and board characteristics matter? A study of Thai family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 119-129.
dc.citation Tekin, E. ve Demirel, S. K. (2017). Yönetim kurulu kalitesinin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisi: BİST-100 firmaları üzerine bir araştırma. Yonetim ve Ekonomi, 24(3), 725-740.
dc.citation Tosi, H. L., Misangyi, V. F., Fanelli, A., Waldman, D. A. ve Yammarino, F. J. (2004). CEO charisma, compensation, and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 405-420.
dc.citation Tuzcu, A. ve Fıkırkoca, A. (2005). Corporate governance approach of Turkish companies operating in the Istanbul Stock Exchange: The case of an emerging market economy in an age of capitalist diversity. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4, 154-172.
dc.citation Vintilă, G., Onofrei, M. ve Gherghina, Ş. C. (2015). The effects of corporate board and CEO characteristics on firm value: empirical evidence from listed companies on the Bucharest stock exchange. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(6), 1244-1260.
dc.citation Whyte, W. H. (1956). The Organization Man. Doubleday: Garden City, NY.
dc.citation Yim, S. (2013). The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 250-273.
dc.citation Zajac, B. ve Stearns, L. B. (1997). CEOs' career backgrounds and corporate long‐term strategic planning. Sociological inquiry, 67(2), 207-226.
dc.citation Zajac, E. J. ve Westphal, J. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 64-90.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account