DSpace Repository

Evaluation of Ministry of Health Instagram Use in the Context of Risk Communication during the Covid-19 Pandemic Process

Show simple item record

dc.creator VONA KURT, Esra; ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator DURAN, Yasemin; ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2021-08-20T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T11:27:37Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T11:27:37Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vizyoner/issue/64477/872303
dc.identifier 10.21076/vizyoner.872303
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/91744
dc.description During high-risk infectious epidemics, it is necessary to reach and inform the public through effective communication strategies in order to identify the existing risk and control the epidemic. In such cases, it is important that the health institutions managing the risk process can convey the risk of epidemic disease to the public with all its dimensions and convey the hope that the epidemic can be controlled with the measures taken, with an interactive communication. The use of social media in the field of health offers opportunities for individuals and health institutions that shape public health within the framework of the opportunity to communicate interactively with large target audiences. For this reason, it becomes important to reveal the effect and function of social media environments in the risk communication process in cases of epidemic risk. The study focuses on the social media activities of the Ministry of Health, which is the only institution that manages and directs the pandemic process in Turkey during Covid-19 pandemic. In the research, the posts shared by the Ministry of Health on the Instagram account are analysed within the framework of risk communication models. The study tries to understand the communication styles, risk content and risk perception adopted by the Ministry on Instagram during the epidemic, and the content and context of the communication carried out by the Ministry of Health on Instagram is examined through shared posts. In the study, which aims to analyse the data collected by the content analysis technique, the findings obtained using descriptive statistical tests are evaluated within the framework of risk communication models.
dc.description Yüksek risk içeren bulaşıcı salgın hastalıklar sırasında, var olan riski tanımlamak ve salgını kontrol altına alabilmek için etkili iletişim stratejileri yoluyla halka ulaşmak ve bilgilendirmek gerekmektedir. Bu tür durumlarda risk sürecini yöneten sağlık kurumlarının salgın hastalık riskini tüm boyutlarıyla halka aktarması ve alınan önlemlerle salgının kontrol altına alınabileceği umudunu etkileşimli bir iletişimle kitlelere aktarabilmesi önemlidir. Sağlık alanında sosyal medya kullanımı, hem bireylere hem de halk sağlığını biçimlendiren sağlık kurumlarına geniş hedef kitlelerle etkileşimli iletişim kurma olanağı çerçevesinde fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle salgın hastalık riski durumlarında sosyal medya ortamlarının risk iletişim sürecindeki etkisini ve işlevini ortaya koymak önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışma Covid-19 pandemisi sırasında ülkemizde pandemi sürecini yöneten ve yönlendiren tek kurum olan Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın sosyal medyadaki etkinliklerine odaklanmaktadır. Araştırmada, Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın Instagram hesabı üzerinden paylaştığı gönderiler, risk iletişimi modelleri çerçevesinde incelenmektedir. Çalışma, bakanlığın salgın sırasında Instagram’da benimsediği iletişim biçimlerini, risk içeriğini ve oluşturulmaya çalışılan risk algısını anlamaya çalışmakta ve Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın Instagram üzerinden gerçekleştirdiği iletişimin içeriği ve bağlamı, paylaşılan gönderiler üzerinden değerlendirilmektedir. İçerik analizi tekniğiyle bir inceleme gerçekleştirmeyi hedefleyen çalışmada, betimsel istatistik testleri kullanılarak elde edilen bulgular, risk iletişim modelleri çerçevesinde analiz edilmektedir.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1548238
dc.source Volume: 12, Issue: 31 712-733 en-US
dc.source 1308-9552
dc.source Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi
dc.subject Risk Communication,Social Media,Instagram,Pandemic,Covid-19
dc.subject Risk İletişimi,Sosyal Medya,Instagram,Pandemi,Covid-19
dc.title Evaluation of Ministry of Health Instagram Use in the Context of Risk Communication during the Covid-19 Pandemic Process en-US
dc.title Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın Instagram Kullanımının Risk İletişimi Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Alaszewski, A. (2005). Risk communication: Identifying the importance of social context. Health and Risk Society, 7(2), 101-105. doi: 10.1080/13698570500148905.
dc.citation Al-Eisa, E., Al-Rushud, A., Alghadir, A., Anwer, S., Al-Harbi, B., Al-Sughaier, N., ... ve Al-Muhaysin, H. A. (2016). Effect of motivation by “Instagram” on adherence to physical activity among female college students. BioMed Research International.
dc.citation Andrienko, N. ve Andrienko, G. (2007). Intelligent visualisation and information presentation for civil crisis management. Transactions in GIS, 11(6), 889-909.
dc.citation Arguin, P. M., Navin, A. W., Steele, S. F., Weld, L. H. ve Kozarsky, P. E. (2004). Health communication during SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(2), 377.
dc.citation Baron, J., Hershey, J. C. ve Kunreuther, H. (2000). Determinants of priority for risk reduction: The role of worry, Risk Analysis. 20(4),413-427.
dc.citation Beck, U. (2014). Risk toplumu başka bir modernliğe doğru. K. Özdoğan ve B. Doğan (Çev.), İstanbul: İthaki Yayınevi.
dc.citation Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe: Free Press.
dc.citation Brug, J., Aro, A. R., Oenema, A., De Zwart, O., Richardus, J. H. ve Bishop, G. D. (2004). SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(8), 1486.
dc.citation Cairns, G.,Andrade, M. ve MacDonald, L. (2013). Risk communication, and the role of trust in the prevention and control of communicable disease: a review. Journal of Health Communication, 18(12), 1550-1565. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.840696.
dc.citation Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P. ve Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e48.
dc.citation Covello. V. T, Winterfeldt, D. ve Slovic, P. (1986). Risk communication: A review of the literature. Risk Abstracts 3(4), 171-182.
dc.citation Covello, V. T. ve Sandman, P.M. (2001). Risk communication: evolution and revolution. P. A. Wolbarst (Ed.), Solutions to an Environment içinde (164-178), Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
dc.citation Covello, V. T., Peters, R. G., Wojtecki, J. G ve Hyde, R. C. (2001). Risk communication, the West Nile Virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(2), 382-392.
dc.citation Custers, K. (2015). The urgent matter of online pro-eating disorder content and children: Clinical practice. European Journal of Pediatrics, 174(4), 429-433.
dc.citation De Boer, J., Wouter Botzen, W. J ve Terpstra, T. (2014). Improving flood risk communication by focusing on prevention focused motivation. Risk Analysis, 34(2), 309-322.
dc.citation Fischhoff, B.(1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2),137-145. doi: 0272-4332/95/0400-0137$07.50/1.
dc.citation Fonkwo, P. N. (2008). Pricing infectious disease the economic and health implications of infectious diseases. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 9, 13-17.
dc.citation Gauthier, T. P. ve Spence, E. (2015). Instagram and clinical infectious diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 61(1), 135-136.
dc.citation Glik, D. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 33–54.
dc.citation Guidry, J. P., Jin, Y., Orr, C. A., Messner, M. ve Meganck, S. (2017). Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: how health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 477-486.
dc.citation Hackett, A. J. (2008). Risk, its perception and the media: The MMR controversy. Community Practice, 81(7), 22–25.
dc.citation Hawn, C. (2009). Take two Aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28(2), 361-368.
dc.citation Holmes, B. J. (2008). Communicating about emerging infectious disease: The importance of research. Health, Risk & Society, 10(4), 349-360.
dc.citation Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G. ve Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 173-190.
dc.citation Huber, C., Finelli, L. ve Stevens, W. (2018). The economic and social burden of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 218(5), 698–704. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy213.
dc.citation Idriss, S. Z., Kvedar, J. C. ve Watson, A. J. (2009). The role of online support communities: Benefits of expanded social networks to patients with psoriasis. Archives of Dermatology, 145(1), 46-51.
dc.citation Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 55(1), 84-93.
dc.citation Kamel Boulos, M. N., Giustini, D. M. ve Wheeler, S. (2016). Instagram and WhatsApp in health and healthcare: An overview. Future Internet, 8(3), 37.
dc.citation Kaplan, A. M. ve Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
dc.citation Karimkhani, C., Connett, J., Boyers, L., Quest, T. ve Dellavalle, R. P. (2014). Dermatology on Instagram. Dermatology Online Journal, 20(7).
dc.citation Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709-1716.
dc.citation Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W. ve De Maeyer, P.(2011). An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis, 31(7), 1055-1068.
dc.citation Khan, S.,Mishra, J. L., Lin, K.E. ve Doyle, E.H. (2017). Rethinking communication in risk interpretation and action. Natural Hazards, 88, 1709–1726. doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-2942-z,
dc.citation Krippendorff, K. (2009). The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.citation Kristiansen, I. S., Halvorsen, P. A. ve Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2007). Influenza pandemic: Perception of risk and individual precautions in a general population, cross sectional study. BMC Public Health, 7(1), 48.
dc.citation Leiss, W. (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 85-94.
dc.citation Lindell, M. K. (2018). Communicating imminent risk. H. Rodríguez, Trainor J. ve W. Donner (Ed.) Handbook of Disaster Research içinde (449-477). New York: Springer.
dc.citation Longest, B. B. ve Rohrer, W. M. (2005). Communication between public health agencies and their external stakeholders. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 28, 189–217.
dc.citation Lovejoy, K. ve Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337-353.
dc.citation Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.citation McAllister-Spooner, S. M. (2009). Fulfilling the dialogic promise: a ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 320-322.
dc.citation Naik, P. A. ve Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 375-388.
dc.citation National Research Council (1989). Improving risk communication. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/1189.
dc.citation Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Burton, S. H., Giraud-Carrier, C. G. ve Fagen, M. C. (2013). Evaluating social media’s capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: Use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promotion Practice, 14(2), 157-162.
dc.citation Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). Content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.citation Nobles, A. L., Leas, E. C., Noar, S., Dredze, M., Latkin, C. A., Strathdee, S. A. veAyers, J. W. (2020). Automated image analysis of Instagram posts: Implications for risk perception and communication in public health using a case study of# HIV. Plos One, 15(5), e0231155.
dc.citation O’Donnell, N. H. ve Willoughby, J. F. (2017). Photo-sharing social media for e-health: analysing perceived message effectiveness of sexual health information on Instagram. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 40(4), 149–159. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2017.1384995.
dc.citation O’Sullivan, J. J., Bradford, R. A., Bonaiuto, M., De Dominicis, S., Rotko, P., Aaltonen, J., Waylen, K.ve Langan, S. J. (2012). Enhancing flood resilience through improved risk communications. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 12 (7), 2271-2282
dc.citation Palenchar, M. J. ve Heath, R. L. (2007). Strategic risk communication: adding value to society. Public Relations Review, 33, 120–129.
dc.citation Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.
dc.citation Paxton, P. (2007). Association memberships and generalized trust: A multilevel model across 31 countries. Social Forces, 86(1), 47-76.
dc.citation Rasmussen, S. A, Jamieson, D. J. ve Bresee, J. S. (2008). Pandemic influenza and pregnant women. Emerging Infectious Diseases,14, 95-100.
dc.citation Renn, O. ve Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. R. E. Kasperson ve P. J. M. Stallen (Ed.). Communicating Risks to the Public içinde (175-218), Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
dc.citation Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. ve Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
dc.citation Sandell, T., Sebar, B. ve Harris, N. (2013). Framing risk: Communication messages in the Australian and Swedish print media surrounding the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41(8), 860-865.
dc.citation Sezgin, F. (2003). Kriz yönetimi. Kırgızistan Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 181-195.
dc.citation Shuchman, M. ve Wilkes, M.S. (1997). Medical scientists and health news reporting: a case of miscommunication. Ann. INtern Med, 126, 976-982.
dc.citation Slovic, P. (1997). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk assessment battlefield. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 59-100.
dc.citation Siegrist, M. (2019). Trust and risk perception: A critical review of the literatüre. Erişim adresi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/risa.13325, (15.09.2020).
dc.citation Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L. ve Taylor, M. (2012). Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise?. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 303-312.
dc.citation Springston, J. K. ve Weaver Lariscy, R. A. (2005). Public relations effectiveness in public health institutions. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 28, 218–245.
dc.citation Thakadu, O. T.,Kolawole, O. D., Sommer, C., Mthombeni, N. ve Ditlhakeng, P. (2017). Flood risk communication within flood prone communities of the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Botswana Notes and Records, 49, 87-105.
dc.citation Tiggemann, M. ve Zaccardo, M. (2015). Exercise to be fit, not skinny: The effect of fitspiration imagery on women's body image. Body Image, 15, 61-67.
dc.citation Tözün, M. ve Sözmen, M. K. (2014). Halk sağlığı bakışı ile sağlık okuryazarlığı. Smyrna Tıp Dergisi, 48-54.
dc.citation Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2011). Sağlığın teşviki ve geliştirilmesine yönelik dönüm noktaları globalkonferanslardan bildiriler, Ankara: Bakanlık Yayın No:813.
dc.citation Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2021). Erişim adresi: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr, (24.01.2021).
dc.citation Vaughan, E. ve Tinker, T. (2009). Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. AmJ Public Health, 99,332-324, doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537
dc.citation Yakut, İ. (2008). İletişim bilimi perspektifinden risk iletişimi stratejileri. İzmit: Umuttepe Yayınları.
dc.citation Ye, M., ve Lyu, Z. (2020). Trust, risk perception, and COVID-19 infections: evidence from multilevel analyses of combined original dataset in China. Social Science & Medicine, 265, 113517.
dc.citation Zahari, R.K. ve Ariffin, R. N. R. (2013). Risk communications: Flood-prone communities of Kualalumpur. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 880-888.
dc.citation Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
dc.citation Washer, P. (2004). Representations of SARS in the British newspapers. Social Science & Medicine, 59(12), 2561-2571.
dc.citation We Are Social. (2020). Erişim adresi: https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020, (15.12.2020).
dc.citation Wise, K. (2001). Opportunities for public relations research in public health. Public Relations Review, 27, 475–487.
dc.citation World Health Organizations. (2020). Erişim adresi: https://www.who.int/health-topics/#H, (11.12.2020).
dc.citation Worldometers. (2021). Erişim adresi: https://worldometers.info, (05.01.2021).


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account