| dc.creator |
Belli, S |
|
| dc.creator |
Cobankara, FK |
|
| dc.creator |
Adanir, N |
|
| dc.date |
2006-04-01T00:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-12-03T11:30:08Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-12-03T11:30:08Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
6bfde70e-6148-4293-af2d-0f8efe2a1ef3 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.1002/jbm.b.30408 |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/6bfde70e-6148-4293-af2d-0f8efe2a1ef3/oai |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/92403 |
|
| dc.description |
In this study, a comparison of the sealing properties of three different resin-based sealers, AH26, Diaket, and EndoREZ with those of the root canal sealer zinc oxide-eugenol-based U/P Root Canal Sealer was performed. Eighty extracted single-rooted human mandibular first premolar teeth were used. The coronal part of each tooth was removed at the apical 17-mm of roots. The root canals were prepared to a size 7 with ProFile 0.06 taper Series 29 rotary instruments in a crown-down manner before lateral condensation of gutta-percha with the tested sealers (n = 20). A fluid filtration method was used for quantitative evaluation of apical leakage. Statistical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between the resin-based sealers groups (AH26, Diaket, and EndoREZ) (P > 0.05). UIP Root Canal Sealer, zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer, leaked significantly more than other tested groups (p < 0.05). Under the limitations of this study, resin-based root canal sealers were found more effective in sealing root canals than the zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals. Inc. |
|
| dc.language |
eng |
|
| dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess |
|
| dc.title |
Sealing properties of different resin-based root canal sealers |
|
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|