| dc.creator |
DURSUN, Ahmet; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
CANBALOĞLU, Abdurrahim Eyüp; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
ŞANLI, Onur Can; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
KASTAMONİ, Yadigar; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.date |
2021-08-22T00:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-12-03T11:46:52Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-12-03T11:46:52Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdutfd/issue/64600/782868 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.17343/sdutfd.782868 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/94098 |
|
| dc.description |
ObjectiveIt was aimed to determine the characteristics of femoralanteversion and inclination angles of individualswho lived Anatolian geography in the inventory of themedical faculty anatomy main science laboratory.Materials and Methods45 femurs (27 male – 18 female) were selected fromthe anatomy laboratory. Femurs were grouped accordingto gender and sides. Photographs of each femurwere taken and digitized. Femoral anteversion angle(FAA) and femoral inclination angle (FIA) measurementswere taken using the Image-J program. With the SPSS 20, statistical data between genders andsides were determined and compared.ResultsIt has been shown in many studies that both FAA andFIA dimensions have lower values than the right sideof the left side and the female gender less than themale gender. However, according to our findings inour study, the p value was above 0.05 in comparingthe measurements of FAA and FIA measures betweenboth genders and the parties. Therefore, there was nosignificantly difference in the statistical data obtained.ConclusionAngular values of the femur may be related to manylower extremity pathologies. For this reason, femoralangle values for each society should be investigatedand values belonging to that society should be revealed.Especially in a society that is located in the transitionzone between Asia and Europe like our society,it is important to reveal the femoral angular values. |
|
| dc.description |
AmaçTıp Fakültesi Anatomi Ana Bilim Dalı laboratuvar envanterindebulunan Anadolu coğrafyasında yaşamışbireylerin femur anteversiyon ve inklinasyon açılarınınözelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve YöntemAnatomi laboratuvarında bulunan 27’si erkek 18’i kadıntoplam 45 femur üzerinde çalışıldı. Femurlar cinsiyetve taraflara göre gruplandırıldı. Her bir femurunfotoğrafı çekildi ve dijital ortama aktarıldı. Image-Jprogramı kullanılarak femoral anteversiyon açısı(FAA) ve femoral inklinasyon açısı (FİA) ölçümlerialındı. Ölçümlerin cinsiyet ve taraflar arasında karşılaştırılmasıSPSS 20 programı ile yapıldı.BulgularYapılan birçok çalışmada hem FAA hem de FİA açılarınınsol tarafta sağ taraftan, kadınlarda erkekleregöre daha küçük olduğu gösterilmiştir. Ancak bizimçalışmamızdaki bulgularımıza göre kadınlardaki ortalamalardaha yüksek bulunmuş olsa da, hem cinsiyethem de taraf karşılaştırmasında FAA, FİA ölçümlerindeistatistiki olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır.SonuçFemura ait açısal değerler birçok alt ekstremite patolojileriile ilgili olabilir. Bu sebeple her toplum için femoralaçı değerleri araştırılarak o topluma ait değerlerortaya konmalıdır. Özellikle bizim toplumumuz gibiAsya ile Avrupa arasındaki geçiş bölgesinde yer alanbir toplumda, femoral açısal değerlerin ortaya konmasıönemlidir. |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
tr |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel University |
|
| dc.relation |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1248725 |
|
| dc.source |
Volume: 28, Issue: 2
263-268 |
en-US |
| dc.source |
1300-7416 |
|
| dc.source |
2602-2109 |
|
| dc.source |
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi |
|
| dc.subject |
femoral anteversion angle,femoral inclinationangle,Image-J |
|
| dc.subject |
femur,femoral anteversiyon açısı,femoral inklinasyon açısı,Image-J |
|
| dc.title |
EVALUATION OF THE FEMORAL ANTEVERSION AND INCLINATION ANGLE OF PEOPLE WHO LIVING IN ANATOLIAN GEOGRAPHY |
en-US |
| dc.title |
ANADOLU COĞRAFYASINDA YAŞAYAN BİREYLERİN FEMUR ANTEVERSİYON VE İNKLİNASYON AÇISININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ |
tr-TR |
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
| dc.citation |
1. Child SL, Cowgill LW. Femoral neck-shaft angle and climate-induced
body proportions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.
2017;164(4):720-35. |
|
| dc.citation |
2. Shrestha A, Ranjit N, Shrestha R. Neck Shaft Angle of Non-articulated
Femur Bones among Adults in Nepal. Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital. 2016;14(2):1-4. |
|
| dc.citation |
3. Anderson JY, Trinkaus E. Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational
variation in human femoral neck-shaft angles.
Journal of Anatomy. 1998;192(Pt 2):279-85. |
|
| dc.citation |
4. Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ,
Bredow J, Lechler P. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain
radiographs: a systematic review. Skeletal Radiology.
2016;45(1):19-28. |
|
| dc.citation |
5. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E, Salama JK, Ochi T TH. The
morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1998;80-B:71:1–9. |
|
| dc.citation |
6. Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Avella M. Femoral neck shaft angle width is
associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently
of femoral neck bone density. British Journal of Radiology.
2014;87(1037):20130358. |
|
| dc.citation |
7. Walton NP, Wynn-Jones H, Ward MS, Wimhurst JA. Femoral
neck-shaft angle in extra-capsular proximal femoral
fracture fixation; does it make a TAD of difference? Injury.
2005;36(11):1361-4. |
|
| dc.citation |
8. Mills HJ, Horne JG, Purdie GL. The Relationship Between Proximal
Femoral Anatomy and Osteoarthrosis of the Hip. Clinical
Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1993 Mar;(288):205-8. |
|
| dc.citation |
9. Argenson JNA, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of
the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2007;465:40–5. |
|
| dc.citation |
10. Olsen M, Davis ET, Gallie PAM, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.
The Reliability of Radiographic Assessment of Femoral Neck-
Shaft and Implant Angulation in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009;24(3):333-40. |
|
| dc.citation |
11. Gilligan I, Chandraphak S, Mahakkanukrauh P. Femoral
neck-shaft angle in humans: Variation relating to climate,
clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. Journal of Anatomy.
2013;223(2):133–51. |
|
| dc.citation |
12. Imamura H. A case of double common bile duct in a deceased
donor for transplantation. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.
2017;39(12):1409–11. |
|
| dc.citation |
13. Gulan G, Matovinović D, Nemec B, Rubinić D, Ravlić-Gulan J,
Matovinovi D, et al. Femoral neck anteversion: values, development,
measurement, common problems. Collegium Antropologicum.
2000;24(2):521. |
|
| dc.citation |
14. Debnath M, Konar S, Kundu P, Debnath M. Study of Femoral
Neck Anteversion and its Correlations in Bengali Population.
International Journal of Anatomy, Radiology and Surgery.
2016;5(1):1–5. |
|
| dc.citation |
15. Zalawadia A, Ruparelia S, Shah S, Parekh D, Patel S, Rathod
SP, et al. Study of femoral neck anteversion of adult dry femora
in Gujarat region. National Journal of Integrated Research in
Medicine. 2010;1(3):7–11. |
|
| dc.citation |
16. Ravichandran D, Devi Sankar K, Sharmila Bhanu P, Manjunath
KY, Shankar R. Angle of femoral neck anteversion in Andhra
Pradesh population of India using image tool software. Journal
International Medical Sciences Academy. 2014;27(4):199–200. |
|
| dc.citation |
17. Fabry G, MacEwen GD, Shands AR. Torsion of the femur. A
follow up study in normal and abnormal conditions. Journal of
Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 1973;55(8):1726-38 |
|
| dc.citation |
18. Günay Y, Özden H, Çetin G. The Length of Bones of Upper and
Lower Extremities in Turkish Society Antropometrical Search.
The Bulletin of Legal Medicine. 2001; 6(1):3-7. |
|
| dc.citation |
19. Bräuer G. Osteometrie. In R. Krussmann (Ed.), Anthropologie I,
Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1988, s. 160–232. |
|
| dc.citation |
20. Emanuela GR. Study on Long Bones: Variation in angular traits
with sex, age, and laterality. Anthropologischer Anzeiger.
1998;4:289–99. |
|
| dc.citation |
21. Moats AR, Badrinath R, Spurlock LB, Cooperman D. The antiquity
of the cam deformity: A comparison of proximal femoral
morphology between early and modern humans. Journal of
Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2015;97(16):1297–
304. |
|
| dc.citation |
22. Kavita B, Ghanshyam G. Angle of Femoral Torsion in Subjects
of Udaipur Region, Rajasthan, India. Journal of Medical and
Health Sciences. 2014;3(1):27–30. |
|
| dc.citation |
23. Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL. A study to determine the angle of
anteversion of the neck of the femur. The Journal of Bone and
Joint Surgery - American Volume 1948;30A(3):745-51. |
|
| dc.citation |
24. Eckhoff DG, Montgomery WK, Kilcoyne RF, Stamm ER. Femoral
Morphometry and anterior knee pain. Clinical Orthopaedics
and Related Research. 1994;302;64-68. |
|