DSpace Repository

The effect of human amniotic fluid on mandibular distraction osteogenesis

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ozgocmen, M.
dc.creator Karasahin, E.
dc.creator Gokce, H. S.
dc.creator Gokce, S. M.
dc.creator Karacayli, U.
dc.creator Nalcaci, R.
dc.creator Avunduk, M. C.
dc.date 2015-03-01T01:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-03T12:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-03T12:04:17Z
dc.identifier e663620d-dce6-43ae-bfb1-bc5624be9dc6
dc.identifier 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.002
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/e663620d-dce6-43ae-bfb1-bc5624be9dc6/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/95520
dc.description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of local administration of human amniotic fluid (HAF) on newly formed bone obtained by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) with histomorphometry. A unilateral mandibular osteotomy at the left corpus was performed in 32 adult male rabbits. After a 5-day latency period, the left mandibles were lengthened by mandibular DO over 5 days, at a rate of 1 mm/day, via a custom-made distractor. After the distraction, the rabbits were divided randomly into four groups: 0.3 ml HAF was injected into the distraction gap followed by 21 (group 1) or 45 (group 2) days of consolidation; or 0.3 ml normal saline (NS) was administered followed by 21 (group 3) or 45 (group 4) days of consolidation. Mandibles were removed at the end of the consolidation period and investigated histomorphometrically. The newly formed bone area (NFBA) and number of fibroblasts increased significantly in the HAF groups compared to the NS groups (NFBA: group 1 vs. group 3, P < 0.05; group 2 vs. group 4, P < 0.01; fibroblasts: group 1 vs. group 3, and group 2 vs. group 4, P < 0.05), and also in both 45-day consolidation groups compared to the 21-day consolidation groups (NFBA: group 1 vs. group 2, and group 3 vs. group 4, P < 0.001; fibroblasts: group 1 vs. group 2, and group 3 vs. group 4, P < 0.01). Additionally, the numbers of osteoblasts and capillaries were increased significantly at 45 days of consolidation compared to 21 days in both the HAF and NS groups (osteoblasts: group 1 vs. group 2, P < 0.01; group 3 vs. group 4, P < 0.05; capillaries: group 1 vs. group 2, and group 3 vs. group 4, P < 0.01). Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that local HAF administration effectively accelerated bone formation. Thus, a HAF injection procedure could improve new bone formation around the bone in maxillofacial operations such as DO.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title The effect of human amniotic fluid on mandibular distraction osteogenesis
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account