DSpace Repository

EFFICACY OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY PROCEDURE OF GREATER OCCIPITAL NERVE PERFORMED TO MIGRAINE PATIENTS

Show simple item record

dc.creator ALASU, Miraç; ısparta şehir hastanesi
dc.creator KIRÇİÇEK, Fahrettin; diyarbakir gazi yaşargil eğitim araştırma hastanesi
dc.creator KIRDEMİR, Pakize; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2021-12-30T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-10T10:58:53Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-10T10:58:53Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdutfd/issue/67913/970553
dc.identifier 10.17343/sdutfd.970553
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/96205
dc.description ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of thegreater occipital nerve (GON) pulsed radiofrequency(PRF) procedure performed to migraine patients onheadache severity, frequency and duration.Material and Methodsİn this retrospective study, the data of 27 patients witha diagnosis of resistant migraine who underwent GONPRF were scanned. The numerical evaluation scale(NRS), headache frequency and duration before theprocedure, 1, 3, 6, 9 months after the procedure,NRS, frequency and duration values of the patientswere compared.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 41.11±12.18. Themean duration of disease diagnosis (years) was12.74±9.42. The mean NRS values of the patientsbefore the GON PRF procedure were 8.81±0.62,the mean attack frequency (month) values were7.70±4.19, and the mean attack duration (hour) valueswere 36.44±20.82. After the GON PRF procedure,1, 3, 6, 9 months NRS, attack frequency and attackduration of the patients were found to be statisticallysignificantly lower when compared with pre-procedureNRS, attack frequency and attack duration.ConclusionsIn our study, we observed that the GON PRFprocedure reduced the severity, frequency andduration of attacks over a 9-month period.
dc.description AmaçBu çalışmanın amacı migren hastalarına uygulananbüyük oksipital sinir (GON) pulsed radyofrekans(PRF) işleminin baş ağrısı şiddet, sıklık ve sürelerineetkisini değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve YöntemBu retrospektif çalışmada dirençli migren tanısı olanve GON PRF işlemi uygulanmış 27 hastanın verileritarandı. Hastaların işlemden önceki sayısal derecelendirmeölçeği (NRS), baş ağrısı sıklığı ve süresi,işlemden sonraki 1.,3.,6.,9. aylardaki NRS, baş ağrısısıklık ve süre değerleriyle karşılaştırıldı.BulgularHastaların yaş ortalamaları 41,11±12,18’di. Hastalıktanı süreleri (yıl) ortalama 12,74±9,42’di. HastalarınGON PRF işlemi öncesi NRS değerleri 8,81±0,62,atak sıklık (ay) değerleri 7,70±4,19, atak süreleri(saat) değerleri 36,44±20,82’di. Hastaların GON PRFişlemi sonrası 1.,3.,6.,9. aylardaki NRS, atak sıklığıve atak süreleri işlem öncesi NRS, atak sıklığı ve ataksüreleri ile kıyaslandığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlıderecede düşük bulundu.SonuçBiz çalışmamızda GON PRF işleminin 9 aylık süreboyunca migren atak şiddetini, sıklığını ve süresiniazalttığını gözlemledik.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1877647
dc.source Volume: 28, Issue: 4 635-640 en-US
dc.source 1300-7416
dc.source 2602-2109
dc.source SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.subject migraine,pulsed radiofrequency,greater occipital nerve
dc.subject migren,pulsed radyofrekans,büyük oksipital sinir
dc.title EFFICACY OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY PROCEDURE OF GREATER OCCIPITAL NERVE PERFORMED TO MIGRAINE PATIENTS en-US
dc.title MİGREN HASTALARINA UYGULANAN BÜYÜK OKSİPİTAL SİNİR PULSED RADYOFREKANS İŞLEMİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation 1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211.
dc.citation 2. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension- type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Lancet Neurol 2018;17(11): 954–76.
dc.citation 3. Lantéri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S. Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(7):837-50.
dc.citation 4. Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, Brink AM, et al. European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine. J Headache Pain 2020;21(1):76
dc.citation 5. D'Antona L, Matharu M. Identifying and managing refractory migraine: barriers and opportunities? J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):89.
dc.citation 6. Tang Y, Kang J, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Influence of greater occipital nerve block on pain severity in migraine patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(11):1750-54.
dc.citation 7. Kwak S, Chang MC. Management of refractory chronic migraine using ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of greater occipital nerve: Two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(45):e13127.
dc.citation 8. Cho SJ, Song TJ, Chu MK. Treatment update of chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017;21(6):26.
dc.citation 9. Hadden S. Neuralgic headache and facial pain. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1940;43:405-8.
dc.citation 10. Zipfel J, Kastler A, Tatu L, Behr J, Kechidi R, Kastler B. Ultrasound- Guided Intermediate Site Greater Occipital Nerve Infiltration: A Technical Feasibility Study. Pain Physician. 2016;19(7):E1027-34.
dc.citation 11. Turkiye Klinikleri J Neurol-Special Topics 2017;10(4): 367-70.
dc.citation 12. Çatav S, Solmaz FA, Kırdemir P. Migren başağrısında büyük oksipital sinir bloğu uygulama sonuçlarımız. Agri 2017;29(1):33– 37.
dc.citation 13. Inan LE, Inan N, Unal-Artık HA, Atac C, Babaoglu G. Greater occipital nerve block in migraine prophylaxis: Narrative review. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(7):908-920
dc.citation 14. Loukas M, El-Sedfy A, Tubbs RS, Louis RG Jr, Wartmann CH, Curry B, Jordan R. Identification of greater occipital nerve landmarks for the treatment of occipital neuralgia. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2006;65(4):337-42.
dc.citation 15. Greher M, Moriggl B, Curatolo M, Kirchmair L, Eichenberger U. Sonographic visualization and ultrasound-guided blockade of the greater occipital nerve: a comparison of two selective techniques confirmed by anatomical dissection. Br J Anaesth 2010;104(5):637–42.
dc.citation 16. Sluijter ME. Pain in Europe, Barcelona. 2nd Annual Congress of the European Federation of IASP Chapters;.Non-thermal Radiofrequency procedures in the treatment spinal pain; 1997; 326.
dc.citation 17. Sluijter ME, Cosman ER, Rittman WB, van Kleef M. The effects of pulsed radiofrequency field applied to the dorsal root ganglion: a preliminary report. Pain Clin. 1998;11:109–117.
dc.citation 18. Erdine S, Yucel A, Cimen A, Aydin S, Sav A, Bilir A. Effects of pulsed versus conventional radiofrequency current on rabbit dorsal root ganglion morphology. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(3):251-56.
dc.citation 19. Cohen SP, Foster A. Pulsed radiofrequency as a treatment for groin pain and orchialgia. Urology. 2003;61(3):645.
dc.citation 20. Hagiwara S, Iwasaka H, Takeshima N, Noguchi T. Mechanisms of analgesic action of pulsed radiofrequency on adjuvant- induced pain in the rat: roles of descending adrenergic and serotonergic systems. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(3):249-52.
dc.citation 21. Y. Higuchi, B.S. Nashold Jr., M. Sluijter, E. Cosman, R.D. Pearlstein Exposure of the dorsal root ganglion in rats to pulsed radiofrequency currents activates dorsal horn lamina I and II neurons. Neurosurgery 2002;50(4):850–55.
dc.citation 22. Arakawa K, Kaku R, Kurita M, Matsuoka Y, Morimatsu H. Prolonged-duration pulsed radiofrequency is associated with increased neuronal damage without further antiallodynic effects in neuropathic pain model rats. J Pain Res. 2018;11:2645-51.
dc.citation 23. Li J, Yin Y, Ye L, Zuo Y. Pulsed Radiofrequency of C2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Under Ultrasound-Guidance and CT Confirmed for Chronic Headache: Follow-Up of 20 Cases and Literature Review. J Pain Res. 2020;13:87-94.
dc.citation 24. Cohen SP, Peterlin BL, Fulton L, Neely ET, Kurihara C, Gupta A, et al. Randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study comparing pulsed radiofrequency to steroid injections for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness. Pain 2015;156(12): 2585-94.
dc.citation 25. Gabrhelík T, Michálek P, Adamus M. Pulsed radiofrequency therapy versus greater occipital nerve block in the management of refractory cervicogenic headache a pilot study. Prague Med Rep. 2011;112:279–87.
dc.citation 26. Manolitsis N, Elahi F. Pulsed radiofrequency for occipital neuralgia. Pain Physician 2014;17:709–17.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account