| dc.creator |
DÜNDAR, İlyas; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
GOYA, Cemil; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
TÜRKO, Ensar; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
ÖZKAÇMAZ, Sercan; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
ÖZGÖKÇE, Mesut; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
DURMAZ, Fatma; VAN YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.creator |
AYYILDIZ, Veysel Atilla; SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE |
|
| dc.date |
2022-03-01T00:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-10T10:58:57Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2022-05-10T10:58:57Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdutfd/issue/68474/986013 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.17343/sdutfd.986013 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/96222 |
|
| dc.description |
ObjectiveCeliac disease (CD) is characterized by an immuneresponse in genetically gluten-sensitive individualsresulting in inflammatory damage of the smallintestine. The radiological identification of pelvicvenous dilatation (PVD) is important as it cancontribute to the diagnosis of different spectrums ofpelvic and systemic diseases. In our study, we aimedto determine the prevalence of PVD in CD patientsand to present our findings with the literature.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective observational study was approvedby the institutional review board in our institution. Allpatients were patients diagnosed with CD by clinicalevaluation, serological data, and intestinal biopsy,and who underwent CT between October 2011and March 2020 in our medical center. CD patients(n=149) and control group (n=250) who had contrastenhancedCT were evaluated for PVD. In all patients,PVD prevalence was examined in the patient and thecontrol group. The diameter of the pelvic veins wasmeasured and noted. Complaints of the patients werenoted from the hospital records.ResultsAmong a total of 149 histopathologically proven patientgroups, there were 93 female and 56 male patientswith a mean age of 35.11±13.03 and 36.23±15.06years, respectively. Among a total of 250 controlgroups; there were 145 females and 105 males witha mean age of 38.65±15.38 and 37.25±13.56 years,respectively. PVD prevalence in the female andmale were 60.22% (n=56) and 41.07% (n=23) in CDpatients, respectively. 46.75% (n=36) CD patientshad abdominal pain and were correlated with PVD(p |
|
| dc.description |
AmaçÇölyak hastalığı (ÇH), genetik olarak glutene duyarlıbireylerde, ince bağırsağın enflamatuar hasarına yolaçan bir immün yanıt ile karakterizedir. Pelvik venözdilatasyonun (PVD) radyolojik olarak tanımlanması,pelvik ve sistemik hastalıkların farklı spektrumlarınınteşhisine katkıda bulunabileceğinden önemlidir.Çalışmamızda ÇH olanlarda PVD prevalansını belirlemeyive bulgularımızı literatür eşliğinde sunmayıamaçladık.Gereç ve YöntemBu retrospektif gözlemsel çalışma, kurumumuzdakietik kurulu tarafından onaylandı. ÇH tanısı alan tümhastalar, klinik değerlendirme, serolojik veriler ve bağırsakbiyopsisi olan ve Ekim 2011-Mart 2020 tarihleriarasında tıp merkezimizde Bilgisayarlı Tomografisi(BT) çekilen hastalardı. Kontrastlı BT yapılan ÇHolanlar (n=149) ve kontrol grubu (n=250) PVD açısındandeğerlendirildi. Hasta ve kontrol grubundaki tümhastalarda PVD prevalansı incelendi. Pelvik damarlarınçapı ölçüldü ve not edildi. Hastaların şikayetlerihastane kayıtlarından not edildi.BulgularHistopatolojik olarak kanıtlanmış toplam 149 hastagrubunda, yaş ortalaması sırasıyla 35,11 ± 13,03 ve36,23 ± 15,06 yıl olan 93 kadın ve 56 erkek hasta vardı.Toplam 250 kontrol grubu arasından; yaş ortalamasısırasıyla 38,65 ± 15,38 ve 37,25 ± 13,56 yıl olan145 kadın ve 105 erkek vardı. Kadın ve erkekte PVDprevalansı ÇH’larında sırasıyla %60,22 (n=56) ve%41,07 (n=23) idi. ÇH’nın %46,75’inde (n=36) karınağrısı vardı ve PVD ile korele idi (p < 0.05). Mezenterikengorjman ve ince bağırsak kıvrım anormallikleriPVD ile korele idi (p < 0,05).SonuçPelvik konjesyon sendromu, kadınlarda çok yaygınolan ve potansiyel olarak önemli sakatlıklara yol açabilenPVD'nin neden olduğu düşünülen kronik pelvikağrının nedenlerinden biridir. Karın ağrısı, ÇH'de görüntülemeyöntemlerinin uygulanmasının önemli birnedenidir. Çalışmamızda ÇH hastalarında karın ağrısıPVD ile korele idi. Ayrıca, PVD prevalansı oldukçayüksekti. Dolayısıyla, ÇH olanlarda kontrastlı BT'degörülen artmış PVD prevalansı pelvik şikayetlerin birbileşeni olabilir. |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
en |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel University |
|
| dc.relation |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1937422 |
|
| dc.source |
Volume: 29, Issue: 1
67-73 |
en-US |
| dc.source |
1300-7416 |
|
| dc.source |
2602-2109 |
|
| dc.source |
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi |
|
| dc.subject |
pelvic venous dilatation,coeliac disease,computed tomography |
|
| dc.subject |
pelvik venöz dilatasyon,çölyak hastalığı,bilgisayarlı tomografi |
|
| dc.title |
EVALUATION OF PELVIC VENOUS DILATATION WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH CELIAC DISEASE |
en-US |
| dc.title |
ÇÖLYAK HASTALARINDA PELVİK VENÖZ DİLATASYONUNUN BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ |
tr-TR |
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
| dc.citation |
1. Gujral N, Freeman HJ, Thomson AB. Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 2012;18(42):6036. |
|
| dc.citation |
2. Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, Not T, Colletti RB, Drago S, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(3):286-92. |
|
| dc.citation |
3. Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Kaushal V, Puri H. Increasing incidence of celiac disease in India. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96(9):2804. |
|
| dc.citation |
4. Soni S, Badawy S. Celiac disease and its effect on human reproduction. J Reprod Med 2010;55:3-8. |
|
| dc.citation |
5. Ludvigsson JF, Reutfors J, Ösby U, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM. Coeliac disease and risk of mood disorders—a general population-based cohort study. J Affect Disord 2007;99(1-3):117-26. |
|
| dc.citation |
6. Addolorato G, Di Giuda D, De Rossi G, Valenza V, Domenicali M, Caputo F, et al. Regional cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with celiac disease. Am J Med 2004;116(5):312-7. |
|
| dc.citation |
7. Umeoka S, Koyama T, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, Akuta K. Vascular dilatation in the pelvis: identification with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2004;24(1):193-208. |
|
| dc.citation |
8. Koo S, Fan C-M. Pelvic congestion syndrome and pelvic varicosities. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;17(2):90-5. |
|
| dc.citation |
9. Park SJ, Lim JW, Ko YT, Lee DH, Yoon Y, Oh JH, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(3):683-8. |
|
| dc.citation |
10. Coakley FV, Varghese SL, Hricak H. CT and MRI of pelvic varices in women. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(3):429-34. |
|
| dc.citation |
11. Phillips D, Deipolyi AR, Hesketh RL, Midia M, Oklu R. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25(5):725-33. |
|
| dc.citation |
12. 1Collin P, Vilska S, Heinonen P, Hällström O, Pikkarainen P. Infertility and coeliac disease. Gut 1996;39(3):382-4. |
|
| dc.citation |
13. Meloni G, Dessole S, Vargiu N, Tomasi P, Musumeci S. The prevalence of coeliac disease in infertility. Hum Reprod 1999;14(11):2759-61. |
|
| dc.citation |
14. Gasbarrini A, Torre ES, Trivellini C, De Carolis S, Caruso A, Gasbarrini et al. Spontaneous abortion and intrauterine fetal growth retardation as symptoms of coeliac disease. The Lancet 2000;356(9227):399-400. |
|
| dc.citation |
15. Ferguson R, Holmes G, Cooke W. Coeliac disease, fertility, and pregnancy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1982;17(1):65-8. |
|
| dc.citation |
16. McCann J, Nicholls D, Verzin J. Adult coeliac disease presenting with infertility. Ulster Med J 1988;57(1):88. |
|
| dc.citation |
17. Sher K, Jayanthi V, Probert C, Stewart C, Mayberry J. Infertility, obstetric and gynaecological problems in coeliac sprue. Dig Dis 1994;12(3):186-90. |
|
| dc.citation |
18. Farthing M, REES LH, Dawson A. Male gonadal function in coeliac disease: III. Pituitary regulation. Clin Endocrinol 1983;19(6):661-71. |
|
| dc.citation |
19. Farthing M, Rees L, Edwards C, Dawson A. Male gonadal function in coeliac disease: 2. Sex hormones. Gut 1983;24(2):127-35. |
|
| dc.citation |
20. Scholz FJ, Afnan J, Behr SC. CT findings in adult celiac disease. Radiographics 2011;31(4):977-92. |
|
| dc.citation |
21. Ibukuro K, Tsukiyama T, Mori K, Inoue Y. Veins of Retzius at CT during arterial portography: anatomy and clinical importance. Radiol 1998;209(3):793-800. |
|
| dc.citation |
22. Nicholson T, Basile A. Pelvic congestion syndrome, who should we treat and how? Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;9(1):19-23. |
|
| dc.citation |
23. Bookwalter CA, VanBuren WM, Neisen MJ, Bjarnason H. Imaging Appearance and Nonsurgical Management of Pelvic Venous Congestion Syndrome. RadioGraphics. 2019;39(2):596-608. |
|
| dc.citation |
24. Engeler DS, Baranowski AP, Dinis-Oliveira P, Elneil S, Hughes J, Messelink EJ, et al. The 2013 EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain: is management of chronic pelvic pain a habit, a philosophy, or a science? 10 years of development. Eur Urol 2013;64(3):431-9. |
|