DSpace Repository

Does Marital Status Affect Violence Against Women? A Perusal on Turkey

Show simple item record

dc.creator ADAK, Nurşen; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator ELMAS, Çağrı; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator KUŞOĞLU, Güher Ceylan; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2021-12-30T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-10T11:02:52Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-10T11:02:52Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sufesosbil/issue/67386/1020919
dc.identifier
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/96285
dc.description The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the marital status of women and violence against women in the family. This relationship is assessed using the data from Survey of Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey carried out by Turkish Statistical Institute in 2014. The survey employed a multistage sampling frame to obtain a national probability sample of women between the ages of 15 and 59-years-old. Women from 15072 households were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire. Among the findings of this study, the most remarkable one is that the relationship between marital status and violence in Turkey varies by the type of violence. Married women are more likely to be exposed to physical violence than single women. The rate of emotional violence committed against women by their family members were higher among divorced women compared to married women. Additionally, divorced or separated women are exposed to economic violence given that their access to economic resources were either limited or prevented by their husbands. When all types of violence were taken into account, it is observed that divorced or separated women have the highest representation among women who are exposed to violence.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2070805
dc.source Volume: , Issue: 54 149-164 en-US
dc.source 1300-9435
dc.source 2667-6206
dc.source Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
dc.subject Violence,Marital Status,Women,Turkey,Logistic Regression
dc.title Does Marital Status Affect Violence Against Women? A Perusal on Turkey tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Altınay, A. G., & Arat, Y. (2008). Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Şiddet. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
dc.citation Birleşmiş Milletler, (1993). Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Ortadan Kaldırılması Bildirgesi, 1993.
dc.citation Brownridge, D. A., Hiebert-Murphy, D., Ristock, J., Chan, K. L., Tiwari, A., Tyler, K. A., & Santos, S. C. (2008). Violence against separated, divorced, and married women in Canada, 2004. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49(3-4), 308-329.
dc.citation Bumpass, L.; Sweet, J.; Cherlin, A. (1991). “The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53: 913–927.
dc.citation Cardinali, P., Migliorini, L., Giribone, F., Bizzi, F., & Cavanna, D. (2018). Domestic Violence in Separated Couples in Italian Context: Communalities and Singularities of Women and Men Experiences. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1602.
dc.citation Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
dc.citation Dawson, M., & Gartner, R. (1998). Differences in the characteristics of intimate femicides:The role of relationship state and relationship status. Homicide Studies, 2, 378-399.
dc.citation DeKeseredy, W. S., & Rennison, C. M. (2013). Comparing female victims of separation/divorce assault across geographical regions. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 2(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v2i1.91.
dc.citation Ekert-Jaffe, O.; Solaz, A. (2001) “Unemployment, marriage, and cohabitation in France”, Journal of Socio-Economics 30: 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00088-9.
dc.citation Eng, S., Li, Y., Mulsow, M., & Fischer, J. (2010). Domestic violence against women in Cambodia: Husband’s control, frequency of spousal discussion, and domestic violence reported by Cambodian women. Journal of Family Violence, 25(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9287-7.
dc.citation Erkan, R., & Bozgöz, F. (2004). “Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Sosyo-ekonomik, Dinsel ve Kültürel Boyutları: Diyarbakır Örneği”. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 18, 219-42.
dc.citation Ertürk, Y. (2015). Sınır Tanımayan Şiddet: Paradigma, Politika ve Pratikteki Yönleriyle Kadına Şiddet Olgusu. Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
dc.citation García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. World Health Organization.
dc.citation Gelles, R. (1985), “Family Violence”, Annual Review Sociology, 11: 347-367.
dc.citation Goode, W. J. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family:33, 624-636.
dc.citation Gravningen, K., Mitchell, K. R., Wellings, K., Johnson, A. M., Geary, R., Jones, K. G. & Field, N. (2017). Reported reasons for breakdown of marriage and cohabitation in Britain: Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). PloS one, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174129.
dc.citation Hotton, T. (2001). Spousal violence after marital separation. Juristat, 21(7), 1–19.
dc.citation İçli, T. G. (1994). “Aile İçi Şiddet: Ankara-İstanbul-İzmir Örneği”. Hacettepe Üniv. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (1-2), 7-20.
dc.citation Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 283-294.
dc.citation Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. L. (2000). “Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions”. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62 (4), 948-63.
dc.citation Kalokhe, A., del Rio, C., Dunkle, K., Stephenson, R., Metheny, N., Paranjape, A., & Sahay, S. (2017). Domestic violence against women in India: A systematic review of a decade of quantitative studies. Global public health, 12(4), 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2015.1119293.
dc.citation Kocacık, F. (2004). Aile İçi İlişkilerde Kadına Yönelik Şiddet. Sivas: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Yayınları no:93.
dc.citation Kury, H., Obergfell-Fuchs, J., & Woessner, G. (2004). The extent of family violence in Europe: A comparison of national surveys. Violence Against Women, 10(7), 749-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265550.
dc.citation Lewinson, D. (1990). Violence in cross-cultural perspective. NewBury Pakk: Sage Publications.
dc.citation Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2004). Separation as a risk factor for victims of intimate partner violence: Beyond lethality and injury: A response to Campbell. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1478-1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269699.
dc.citation Nazio, Tiziana, (2008) Cohabition, Family and Society, Routledge
dc.citation Parker, R.; Vassallo, S., (2009) “Young Adults' Attitudes towards Marriage”, Family Relationships Quarterly Newsletter, Australian Institute of Family Studies, 12:. 18–21.
dc.citation Sanz-Barbero, B., Corradi, C., Otero-García, L., Ayala, A., & Vives-Cases, C. (2018). The effect of macrosocial policies on violence against women: a multilevel study in 28 European countries. International journal of public health, 63(8), 901-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1143-1.
dc.citation Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., Chen, J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf.
dc.citation Simmons J, Dodd T Ed. (2003). Crime in England and Wales 2002/2003. Home Office Statistical Bulletin.1 January 2008 http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/ hosb703.pdf.
dc.citation Star, B. (1980), “Patterns in Family Violence”, Social Casework, 61(6): 339-346
dc.citation Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence,4(2), 161-180.
dc.citation Sutton, D., & Dawson, M. (2018). Differentiating characteristics of intimate partner violence: do relationship status, state, and duration matter?. Journal of interpersonal violence, https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518795501.
dc.citation T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu (1998). Aile İçinde ve Toplumsal Alanda Şiddet (AİTAŞ), Ankara.
dc.citation TC Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu (1995). Aile içi şiddetin sebep ve sonuçları. 1. baskı, Ankara, Zet Nielson Şirketi, Bizim Büro Basımevi, 205.
dc.citation Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması” (2015) Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, Ankara.
dc.citation Williamson, G. M., & Silverman, J. G. (2001). Violence against female partners: Direct and interactive effects of family history, communal orientation, and peer-related variables. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(4), 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501184006.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account