DSpace Repository

Analysis of 35 Years of Social Responsibility Research: Examination of Master and Doctoral Theses

Show simple item record

dc.creator HOŞTUT, Sibel; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator SIRSAT, Sevda; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.creator ARSLAN, Özge; AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2022-02-20T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-10T11:04:38Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-10T11:04:38Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vizyoner/issue/68457/899598
dc.identifier 10.21076/vizyoner.899598
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/96348
dc.description Since the scope of social responsibility is not clear both at the institutional level and the academy, it is difficult to determine its limits. In order to clarify this issue, explain the thematic distribution, and structure of the literature social responsibility theses written in Turkey in the last 35 years are analyzed by bibliometric analysis and content analysis. The fact that business literature is at the center of the concept social responsibility explains that 90% of the theses are written in the Institute of Social Sciences, and 40% in the Business Department which is also reflected in the theses titles. The strongest cluster of studies focuses on social responsibility practices in the Turkish private sector regarding brand and corporate image, reputation, ethical values, and financial performance. Most of the stakeholder studies are about consumer buying behavior and employee loyalty relationship. Special attention has been paid to the tourism and banking sectors, other sectors have not been adequately researched. Non-governmental organizations, volunteering, and international standards have been studied in a limited number. A.B.Carroll, is the dominant author, both as the author of the top three most cited articles, and the first in the ranking with a distinct difference from other authors.
dc.description Sosyal sorumluluk kavramının kapsam alanı hem kurumsal düzeyde hem de akademide net olmadığından kavramın sınırlarını belirlemek oldukça güçtür. Bu konuya açıklık getirebilmek, çalışmaların tematik dağılımına ve literatür yapısına ilişkin açıklamalar yapabilmek için Türkiye’de son 35 yılda sosyal sorumluluk konusunda yazılan lisansüstü tezler bibliyometrik analiz ve içerik analizi teknikleriyle incelenmiştir. Sosyal sorumluluk kavramının merkezinde işletme literatürünün olması, lisansüstü tezlerin %90’ının Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü’nde ve %40’ının İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı’nda yazılmasını açıklamaktadır. Çalışmaların başlıkları arasında önemli bir kümeyi Türkiye özelinde özel sektöre ilişkin sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarının markaya/kurum imajına, kurumsal itibara, etik değerlere ve finansal performansa etkisi ve ilişkisi oluşturmaktadır. Kurum paydaşlarından en fazla çalışma tüketicilerin satın alma davranışları ile çalışanların kuruma bağlılık ilişkisine yöneliktir. Sektör konusunda ise turizm ve bankacılık sektörlerine özel ilgi gösterilmiş, ancak diğer sektörler yeterince araştırılmamıştır. Ayrıca sivil toplum kuruluşları, gönüllülük, uluslararası standartlar gibi konular çok sınırlı sayıda çalışılmıştır. En sık atıf yapılan yazarlar listesinde yer alan A.B. Carroll, hem en sık atıf alan ilk üç makalenin yazarı olarak hem de diğer yazarlarla arasında oldukça belirgin bir farkla sıralamada birinci sırada yer alarak tek baskın yazar olarak bulgulanmıştır.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1648465
dc.source Volume: 13, Issue: 33 70-86 en-US
dc.source 1308-9552
dc.source Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi
dc.subject Social Responsibility,Master and Doctoral Theses,Bibliometric Analysis,Title Analysis,Keyword Analysis
dc.subject Sosyal Sorumluluk,Lisansüstü Tezler,Bibliyometrik Analiz,Başlık Analizi,Anahtar Kelime Analizi
dc.title Analysis of 35 Years of Social Responsibility Research: Examination of Master and Doctoral Theses en-US
dc.title 35 Yıllık Sosyal Sorumluluk Araştırmalarının Analizi: Yüksek Lisans ve Doktora Tezlerinin İncelenmesi tr-TR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L. ve Davidsdottir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4, 1-23.
dc.citation Aguinis, H. ve Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
dc.citation Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L. ve Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
dc.citation Arıkan, R. (2017). Araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
dc.citation Avrupa Komisyonu. (2001). Green paper – Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0366en01.pdf adresinden 25 Temmuz 2020 tarihinde alınmıştır.
dc.citation Avrupa Komisyonu. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 25.10.2011, COM (2011) 681 final.
dc.citation Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A. ve Soverchia, M. (2020). Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1297-1309.
dc.citation Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.
dc.citation Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44(7), 1049.
dc.citation Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper and Row.
dc.citation Boyraz, M., Kabakulak, A. ve Mutlu, A. S. (2020). Hazırlanmakta olan turizm konulu lisansüstü tezlerin veri görselleştirme tekniği ile bibliyometrik analizi: 2006-2020 yılları örneği. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 1434-1453.
dc.citation Britannica. (2020). Sherman Antitrust Act. https://www.britannica.com/event/Sherman-Antitrust-Act adresinden 26 Aralık 2020 tarihinde alınmıştır.
dc.citation Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society, 38, 268-295.
dc.citation Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is on a sustainable trajectory. Journal of Defence Management, 5(2), 1-2.
dc.citation Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. ve Siegel, D. S. (2008). The corporate social responsibility agenda. A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon ve D. S. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility içinde (s. 3-15), Oxford University Press.
dc.citation Dabi, Y., Darrigues, L., Katsahian, S., Azoulay, D., De Antonio, M. ve Lazzati, A. (2016). Publication trends in bariatric surgery: A bibliometric study. Obesity Surgery, 26(11), 2691-2699.
dc.citation Dabic, M., Colovic, A., Lamotte, O., Painter-Morland, M. ve Brozovic, S. (2016). Industry-specific CSR: Analysis of 20 years of research. European Business Review, 28, 250-273.
dc.citation Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13.
dc.citation De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P. ve Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
dc.citation Feng, Y., Zhu, Q. ve Lai, K. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 296-307.
dc.citation Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M. ve Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price’s model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000045112.11562.11
dc.citation Frynas, J. G. ve Stephens, S. (2014). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1-27.
dc.citation Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02019306
dc.citation Ghobadian, A., Money, K. ve Hillenbrand, C. (2015). Corporate responsibility research: Past—present—future. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 271-294.
dc.citation Gomez, L. (2014). The Importance of university social responsibility in Hispanic Amerıia: A responsible trend in developing countries. G. Eweje (Ed.), Critical Studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
dc.citation Google Akademik. (2021). Social responsibility. https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?q=%22social+responsibility%22&hl=tr&as_sdt=0,5 adresinden 16 Ocak 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır.
dc.citation He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-59.
dc.citation Heald, M. (1970). The social responsibilities of business: Company and community 1900–1960. Pr. of Case Western Reserve Univ.
dc.citation Ji, Y., Tao, W. ve Rim, H. (2020). Mapping corporate social responsibility research in communication: A network and bibliometric analysis. Public Relations Review, 46, 101963, 1-16.
dc.citation Kenton, W. (2020). Robber Barons. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/robberbarons.asp#:~:text=A%20robber%20baron%20is%20a%20term%20used%20frequently%20in%20the,Cornelius%20Vanderbilt%2C%20and%20John%20D adresinden 26 Aralık 2020 tarihinde alınmıştır.
dc.citation Lisée, C., Larivière, V. ve Archambault, É. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776-1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20888
dc.citation Lockett, A., Moon, J. ve Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of ınfluence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115-136.
dc.citation Low, M. ve Siegel, D. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of employee-centred corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s. Social Responsibility Journal, 16, 691-717.
dc.citation Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the light of management science – bibliometric analysis. Procedia Engineering, 182, 412-417.
dc.citation Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Methods in Various Disciplines I: Psychology, 1(2), 1-10.
dc.citation McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S. ve Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
dc.citation Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: A European perspective. The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, 13(6), 1-22.
dc.citation Ortiz-Avram, D., Domnanovich, J., Kronenberg, C. ve Scholz, M. (2018). Exploring the integration of corporate social responsibility into the strategies of small- and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 254-271.
dc.citation Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.
dc.citation Sajjad, A. ve Eweje, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in Pakistan: current trends and future directions. G. Eweje (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: Emerging trends in developing economies içinde (s. 163-187). Bingley, Emerald.
dc.citation Sarkar, S. ve Searcy, C. (2016). Zeitgeist or chameleon? A quantitative analysis of CSR definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1423-1435.
dc.citation Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
dc.citation Stefano, F. D., Bagdadli, S. ve Camuffo, A. (2018). The HR role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability: A boundary‐shifting literature review. Human Resource Management, 57, 549-566.
dc.citation Vázquez-Carrasco, R. ve López-Pérez, M. E. (2013). Small & medium-sized enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: A systematic review of the literature. Quality & Quantity, 47, 3205-3218.
dc.citation Waddock, S. A. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109, 5-42.
dc.citation Wang, X., Chen, L., Wenli, M. ve Zhichao, F. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103, 555–564.
dc.citation Yaşın, C., Çetin, M. ve Sönmez, B. (2017). Halkla ilişkiler alanındaki doktora tezleri üzerinden Türkiye ve ABD’de bilimsel bilginin gelişiminin analizi. Selçuk İletişim, 10(1), 454-480.
dc.citation Ye, N., Kueh, T., Hou, L., Liu, Y. ve Yu, H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 1-15.
dc.citation Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
dc.citation Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2020). Tez merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ adresinden 31 Aralık 2020 tarihinde alınmıştır.
dc.citation Zupic, I. ve Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account