DSpace Repository

Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrolü Sürecinde Bina Projesine Ait Verilerin Gösterimleri

Show simple item record

dc.creator AYDIN, Murat; İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
dc.date 2022-04-30T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-10T11:14:24Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-10T11:14:24Z
dc.identifier https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mbud/issue/69408/988508
dc.identifier 10.30785/mbud.988508
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/96429
dc.description BIM, inşaat endüstrisinde bina projelerin bilgi alışverişinde en etkili platform olarak kabul edilmektedir ve çeşitli yazılımların geliştirilmesini desteklemektedir. BIM tasarımcı, mimar, mühendis, yüklenici, mal sahibi vb. gibi projede yer alan katılımcılar için bina projelerinin bina yönetmeliklerine ve standartlarına göre uygunluğunun otomatik veya yarı otomatik olarak kontrol edilmesini kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrolü (Automated Code Compliance Checking, ACCC) sürecinde bina projesine ait veriler iki şekilde temsil edilmektedir. Bunlar BIM modeli ve IFC veya IFCXML veri standardıdır. Bu çalışmada, ACCC sürecinde bina projesine ait verilerin BIM, IFC ve IFCXML gösterimi örnek konut projesi üzerinden anlatılmıştır. Örnek konut projesi bir katı bodrum olmak üzere toplamda 9 kattan, 8 daireden ve 2 asansörden oluşmaktadır.
dc.description BIM is widely acknowledged as the most effective platform for building project information sharing in the construction sector. It aids in the creation of numerous software applications. It enables automated or semi-automated ACCC of the building projects for compliance with building regulations and standards for parties (architect, contractor, engineer, owner, designer, etc.) participating in the building production process. The data from the building project is represented in two ways in the ACCC process. These are BIM Model, and IFC or IFCXML Data Standard. In this study, the BIM, IFC, and IFCXML representations of the building project data were described using a sample housing project in the ACCC process. The sample housing project has 9 floors, 8 units, and 2 elevators.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language tr
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
dc.publisher Süleyman Demirel University
dc.relation https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1947530
dc.source Volume: 7, Issue: Özel Sayı 1-15 en-US
dc.source 2548-0170
dc.source Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications
dc.subject BIM (bina enformasyonu modellemesi),IFC (endüstri temel sınıfları),IFCXML,konut projesi,ACCC (bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü)
dc.subject BIM (building information modelling),IFC (industry foundation classes),IFCXML,housing project,ACCC (automated code compliance checking)
dc.title Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrolü Sürecinde Bina Projesine Ait Verilerin Gösterimleri tr-TR
dc.title The Building Project’s Data Representations in the Automated Code Compliance Checking Process en-US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.citation Aydın, M., ve Yaman, H. (2018). Bina enformasyonu modellemesi (bim) tabanlı bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü literatürüne genel bir bakış. Tasarım + Kuram, 14(25), s. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2018.25744
dc.citation Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020a). Bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü kavramına yönelik bir literatür taraması. Tasarım + Kuram, 16(29), s. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.86158
dc.citation Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020b). Domain knowledge representation languages and methods for building regulations. In: Ofluoglu S., Ozener O., Isikdag U. (eds) Advances in Building Information Modeling. EBF 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1188 CCIS, pp. 101–121, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42852-5_9
dc.citation buildingSMART. (2020). buildingSMART International. https://www.buildingsmart.org
dc.citation buildingSMART Türkiye. (2019). buildingSmart Türkiye. http://www.buildingsmartturkiye.org/index.php/hakkinda/buildingsmart-turkiye
dc.citation Dimyadi, J., ve Amor, R. (2013). Automated Building Code Compliance Checking – Where is it at? Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 172–185.
dc.citation Dimyadi, J., Clifton, C., Spearpoint, M., ve Amor, R. (2014). Regulatory Knowledge encoding guidelines for automated compliance audit of building engineering design. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), pp. 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.067
dc.citation Ding, L., Drogemuller, R., Rosenman, M., Marchant, D., ve Gero, J. (2006). Automating code checking for building designs - DesignCheck. Clients Driving Innovation: Moving Ideas into Practice, pp. 1–16. https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/4842
dc.citation Fenves, S. J., Garrett, J. H., Kiliccote, H., Law, K. H., ve Reed, K. A. (1995). Computer representations of design standards and building codes: US perspective. The International Journal of Construction Information Technology, 3(1), pp. 13–34.
dc.citation Graphisoft. (2018). ArchiCAD 21. https://www.graphisoft.com/archicad/
dc.citation Greenwood, D., Lockley, S., Malsane, S., ve Matthews, J. (2010). Automated Compliance Checking Using Building İnformation Models. Proceedings of the Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference, 2-3 September, Paris, France, pp. 363–371.
dc.citation IAI. (1997). Release 1.0 IFC Model Architecture. International Alliance for Interoperability. http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/
dc.citation ISO_10303-11. (1997). Product Data Representation and Exchange Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/38047.html
dc.citation Lee, H., Lee, J.-K., Park, S., ve Kim, I. (2016). Translating building legislation into a computer-executable format for evaluating building permit requirements. Automation in Construction, 71, pp. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.008
dc.citation Martins, J. P., ve Monteiro, A. (2013). LicA: a bim based automated code-checking application for water distribution systems. Automation in Construction, 29(23), pp. 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.08.008
dc.citation Nawari, N. O. (2012). Automating codes conformance. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18(4), pp. 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000049
dc.citation Nawari, N. O., ve Alsaffar, A. (2015). Understanding computable building codes. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(6), pp. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2015.030601
dc.citation NBIMS-US. (2015). National BIM Standard–United States Version 3. National Inst. of Building Sciences Washington, DC. https://www.nibs.org/news/242663/buildingSMART-alliance-Releases-NBIMS-US-Version-3.html
dc.citation Shih, S.-Y., Sher, W. ve Giggins, H. (2013). Assessment of the building code of Australia to inform the development of BIM-enabled code checking system. Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1–12.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account