DSpace Repository

Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: Machine Learning-based Computed Tomography Radiomics for Prediction of Histological Variant

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ali Gedik, Mehmet
dc.creator Ahmet Serel, Tekin
dc.creator ERTUNÇ, Onur
dc.creator Alperen Ozturk, Sefa
dc.creator EVRİMLER, Şehnaz
dc.creator Soyupek, Sedat
dc.date 2022-11-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-09T12:04:10Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-09T12:04:10Z
dc.identifier 73992165-f8df-40a9-9d1e-2f4cee9e0cca
dc.identifier 10.1016/j.acra.2022.02.007
dc.identifier https://avesis.sdu.edu.tr/publication/details/73992165-f8df-40a9-9d1e-2f4cee9e0cca/oai
dc.identifier.uri http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/97994
dc.description © 2022 The Association of University RadiologistsRationale and Objectives: Histological variant (HV) of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a significant factor for therapy management. We aim to assess the predictive performance of machine learning (ML)-based Computed Tomography radiomics of UC for HV. Materials and Methods: Volume of interest of 37 bladder UC tumors, of which 21 were pure and 16 were HV, were manually segmented. The extracted first- and second-order texture features (n = 117) using 3-D Slicer radiomics were compared to the radical cystectomy histopathological results. ML algorithms were performed to determine the significant models using Python 2.3, Pycaret library. The sample size was increased to 74 by synthetic data generation, and three outliers from the training set were removed (training dataset; n = 52, test dataset; n = 19). The predictive performances of 15 ML algorithms were compared. Then, the best two models were evaluated on the test set and ensembled by Voting Classifier. Results: The ML algorithms demonstrated area under curve (AUC) and accuracy ranging 0.79-0.97 and 50%-90%, respectively on the train set. The best models were Gradient Boosting Classifier (AUC: 0.95, accuracy: 90%) and CatBoost Classifier (AUC: 0.97, accuracy: 85%). On the test set; the Voting Classifier of these two models demonstrated AUC, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores as follows; 0.93, 79%, 86%, 67%, and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: ML-based Computed Tomography radiomics of UC can predict HV, a prognostic factor that is indeterminable by qualitative radiological evaluation and can be missed in the preoperative histopathological specimens.
dc.language eng
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.title Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: Machine Learning-based Computed Tomography Radiomics for Prediction of Histological Variant
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account