| dc.creator |
ÖZTÜRK, Kenan; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
ÖZDEMİR, Berfu; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
DURSUN, Ahmet; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
KASTAMONİ, Yadigar; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.creator |
ALBAY, Soner; SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, ANATOMİ ANABİLİM DALI |
|
| dc.date |
2021-09-13T00:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-12-03T11:47:03Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-12-03T11:47:03Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdutfd/issue/64881/819033 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.17343/sdutfd.819033 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://acikerisim.sdu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/94242 |
|
| dc.description |
ObjectiveWe aimed to get morphometric data of the proximalulna, besides torsion angle, which is rarely found inthe literature.Materials and MethodsIn this study, 25 ulna (11 left, 14 right) found in theAnatomy Department laboratory were used. Eightmorphometric parameters of the proximal ulnawere measured. All dry bones were photographedusing a ruler and transferred to the computer. Then,morphometric measurements were made with thehelp of Image-J analysis program.ResultsIn our measurement we noted that the mean ulnalength was 251.02 ± 16.23 mm and the mean ulnalength except trochlear notch was 223.49 ± 15.52mm. The mean radial notch width was 18.5 ± 3.38mm, the mean radial notch height was 12.09 ± 1.70mm, and the mean trochlear notch depth was 11.57± 1.73 mm. Mean torsion angle, dorsal angulationand varus angle were calculated respectively; 14.64± 8.36º; 5.94º ± 2.01º; 12.48º ± 2.425º. There was nostatistically significant difference in any parameter inthe comparison between the sides.ConclusionThe anatomical shape of the proximal ulna causesspecific difficulties for implants used in humeroulnararthroplasty. The fact that there is no differencebetween the right and left sides in all parametersin this study suggests that the knowledge of theopposite side ulna can be used in the appropriateprosthesis design. In addition, the results of this studywill provide data on ulna dimensions in forensic andanthropological studies. |
|
| dc.description |
AmaçLiteratürde az yer alan torsiyon açısı da dahil olmaküzere proksimal ulna’ya ait diğer bazı morfometrik verilerinelde edilmesi amaçlandı.Gereç ve YöntemBu çalışmada Anatomi Ana Bilim Dalı laboratuvarındabulunan 25 ulna (11 sol, 14 sağ) kullanıldı. Proksimalulna'ya ait 8 morfometrik parametre ölçüldü. Tüm kurukemikler bir cetvel eşliğinde fotoğraflandı ve bilgisayaraaktarıldı. Daha sonra Image-J analiz programıyardımıyla morfometrik ölçümler yapıldı.BulgularOrtalama ulna uzunluğu 251,02±16.23 mm ve ortalamaincisura trochlearis hariç ulna uzunluğu223,49±15.52 mm bulundu. Ortalama incisura radialisgenişliği 18,5±3.38 mm, ortalama incisura radialisyüksekliği 12,09±1.70 mm ve ortalama incisura trochlearisderinliği 11,57±1.73 mm bulundu. Ortalama torsiyonaçısı, dorsal açılanma ve varus açısı sırasıyla14,64º±8.36º; 5,94º±2.01º; 12,48º±2.425º olarak hesaplandı.Hiçbir parametrede taraflar arası karşılaştırmadaistatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı.SonuçProksimal ulna’nın anatomik şekli, humeroulnar artroplastidekullanılan implantlar için özel zorluklar oluşturmaktadır.Bu çalışmadaki tüm parametrelerde sağve sol taraflar arasında fark olmaması, uygun proteztasarımında karşı taraf ulna’nın bilgisinden yararlanılabileceğinidüşündürmektedir. Ayrıca bu çalışmanınsonuçları, adli ve antropolojik araştırmalarda ulna boyutlarınailişkin veriler sağlayacaktır. |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
tr |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi |
|
| dc.publisher |
Süleyman Demirel University |
|
| dc.relation |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1372950 |
|
| dc.source |
Volume: 28, Issue: 3
419-426 |
en-US |
| dc.source |
1300-7416 |
|
| dc.source |
2602-2109 |
|
| dc.source |
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi |
|
| dc.subject |
Ulna,Morphometry,Torsion angulation,Varus angulation,Dorsal angulation |
|
| dc.subject |
Ulna,Morfometri,Torsiyon açılanması,Varus açılanması,Dorsal açılanma |
|
| dc.title |
ANATOMICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ANGULATIONS OF THE PROXIMAL ULNA |
en-US |
| dc.title |
PROKSİMAL ULNA’NIN ANATOMİK MİMARİSİ VE AÇILANMALARI |
tr-TR |
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
| dc.citation |
Beşer CG, Demiryürek D, Özsoy H, Erçakmak B, Hayran M, Kızılay O, et al. Redefining the proximal ulna anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(10):1023–31. |
|
| dc.citation |
Brownhill JR, Mozzon JB, Ferreira LM, Johnson JA, King GJW. Morphologic analysis of the proximal ulna with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18(1):27–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.03.008 |
|
| dc.citation |
Totlis T, Anastasopoulos N, Apostolidis S, Paraskevas G, Terzidis I, Natsis K. Proximal ulna morphometry: which are the “true” anatomical preshaped olecranon plates? Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(10):1015–22. |
|
| dc.citation |
Rouleau DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation: A radiographic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(1):26–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.005 |
|
| dc.citation |
Jaehon K, Mudgal C, Konopka J, Jup J. Complications of total elbow arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(6):328-39. |
|
| dc.citation |
Gul H, Nizami SM, Khan MA. Estimation of Body Stature Using the Percutaneous Length of Ulna of an Individual. 2020;12(1):8–13. |
|
| dc.citation |
Ilayperuma I, Nanayakkara G, Palahepitiya N. A Model for the Estimation of Personal Stature from the Length of Forearm. 2010;28(4):1081–6. |
|
| dc.citation |
Windisch G, Clement H, Grechenig W, Tesch NP, Pichler W. The anatomy of the proximal ulna. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007 Sep;16(5):661–6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1058274607002388 |
|
| dc.citation |
Bailey CS, MacDermid J, Patterson SD, King GJW. Outcome of plate fixation of olecranon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(8):542–8. |
|
| dc.citation |
Lavigne G, Baratz M. Fractures of the olecranon. J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2004;4(2):94–102. |
|
| dc.citation |
Nowinski RJ, Nork SE, Segina DN, Benirschke SK. Comminuted fracture-dislocations of the elbow treated with an AO wrist fusion plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;(378):238–44. |
|
| dc.citation |
Yong WJ, Tan J, Adikrishna A, Lee HJ, Jung JW, Cho DW, et al. Morphometric analysis of the proximal ulna using three-dimensional computed tomography and computer-aided design: varus, dorsal, and torsion angulation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(8):763–8. |
|
| dc.citation |
Wang AA, Mara M, Hutchinson DT. The proximal ulna: An anatomic study with relevance to olecranon osteotomy and fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12(3):293–6. |
|
| dc.citation |
Erdem H. Surgical importance of radiographically aided morphometry of the proximal ulna. Int J Morphol. 2020;38(2):299–304. |
|
| dc.citation |
Grechenig W, Clement H, Pichler W, Tesch NP, Windisch G. The influence of lateral and anterior angulation of the proximal ulna on the treatment of a Monteggia fracture. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B. 2007;89(6):836–8. |
|
| dc.citation |
Cowal LS, Pastor RF. Dimensional Variation in the Proximal Ulna : Evaluation of a Metric Method for Sex Assessment. Am J Phys Anthropol Off Publ Am Assoc Phys Anthropol. 2008;135(4):469–78. |
|
| dc.citation |
Ndou R, Schepartz LA. Morphometric Characteristics of the Humerus and Ulna in Limbs Bearing the Supratrochlear Aperture (STA). Anat Rec. 2016;299(2):220–33. |
|
| dc.citation |
Sakaue K. Sexual determination of long bones in recent Japanese. Anthropol Sci. 2004;112(1):75–81. |
|
| dc.citation |
Rouleau DM, Canet F, Chapleau J, Petit Y, Sandman E, Faber KJ, et al. The influence of proximal ulnar morphology on elbow range of motion. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(3):384–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.008 |
|